Authorities Keep Threatening NGOs in Hungary

HCLU considers attempts by the Hungarian Government Control Office (Kormányzati Ellenőrzési Hivatal, KEHI) to control programs supported from the Norwegian NGO Fund to be part of a political attack.

In order to maintain its credibility, our organization has decided to publish the full documentation of its projects under investigation to make it available to the public. At the same time, we do not wish to cooperate with KEHI. The current investigation launched by the authority represents yet another step in the government attack against Hungarian NGOs. You can read more on this here.

A few days ago KEHI called on HCLU, just like several other Hungarian NGOs, to deliver, among other documents related to the organization, the full documentation (contracts, receipts, correspondence) of its two programs financed from the Norwegian NGO Fund. Previously, government politicians made it clear that the investigation would take place because Norwegian NGO support, as they claimed, had been granted to organizations with links to left-wing parties. In such circumstances, HCLU has no doubts regarding the actual aim of the investigation, which is to threaten the remaining opposition powers and suppress the voice of civil organizations that are critical towards the government.

Maintaining that KEHI is unauthorized to conduct direct investigations, HCLU passed on its reservations regarding the legal bases of the investigation to the Office on Friday. Furthermore, as KEHI, even though declaring the principles of transparency, has so far failed to disclose the identity of the person or organization who ordered the investigation, or to tell how many persons paid from public funds are involved in it, HCLU submitted a public interest data request. It is legitimate to ask: exactly how much does this official action cost to the people? By the way, one of the two HCLU projects concerned by the investigation deals with the spending of public funds. As a result of the project, the motorway investment at Sávoly that lacked any sound basis was suspended, meaning that 35 billion HUF (about 115 million Euros) of taxpayers’ money was saved from misappropriation.

„We account for everything in front of the public but not in front of the government that should not be controlling anything in this regard. As a watchdog organization, we often encourage citizens to stand up for their rights. Now we are to defend ourselves against the politically motivated unlawful attacks. We consider charges related to political bias to be absurd, since we have always criticized those in power for abusing their power and committing breaches of rights. We have done this in the past and keep doing so today.” – said Stefánia Kapronczay, the Executive Director of HCLU.

All project documentations refuting the absurd charges can be accessed by the public by clicking here.

Share

Related articles

Hungarian NGOs contribute to the European Commission’s second Rule of Law Report

Eight Hungarian NGOs submitted a joint contribution in the stakeholder consultation launched by the European Commission for its second annual Rule of Law Report. The Commission’s Rule of Law Report pertaining to 2019 identified substantial problems severely threatening the rule of law in Hungary in all four areas examined. According to the NGOs, the situation has deteriorated further in 2020. They trust that in this year’s report, the Commission will make concrete, enforceable recommendations to EU Member States, hence also for Hungary on how to advance rule of law in the EU.

HCLU released its report on 2019 elections

One of the key lessons of the report is that the legislators are currently not interested in establishing a fair and just electoral system.

Hungarian Parliament is about to enact new anti-terror laws

The Hungarian Government wishes to fight against terrorism on two levels. There is an ongoing procedure that aims to amend the Fundamental Law with a new state of emergency. There is also a legislative package for peacetime. It would amend several Acts in order to enhance the effectiveness of the state in combatting against terrorism. Previous versions of this bill would have banned end-to-end encryption, and imposed criminal sanctions for their users and providers. While the current version is much more moderate, there are several provisions that would impose disproportionate restrictions on fundamental rights.