Corruption Monitor - Summary from March 2020 to March 2022

In Hungary, the erosion of the constitutional state and the elevation of corruption to the status of a public policy tool are happening simultaneously, in close connection with each other, mostly hidden behind some alleged public interest objective. In the last two years, this alleged public interest objective has been to control the pandemic. K-Monitor and the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union have been documenting this process since the start of the pandemics. The summary and final report of this work covers the period from March 2020 to March 2022. In our report, we present the most significant changes in the last two years that have increased opacity and hampered the fight against corruption, budgetary irregularities, the outsourcing of public assets and measures that disproportionately affect opposition municipalities.

In the past two years, while the coronavirus has claimed more than 45,000 lives in Hungary, we have seen the following trends:

1. Lack of transparency has increased, making it more difficult to fight corruption, including:

    • non-transparent management of the pandemic;

    • amending the definition of public funds;

    • a significant increase in the number of non-public government decrees; and

    • creation of the Concession Council.

    2. Public spending on the pandemic was non-transparent and unsustainable due to:

    - the creation of a huge deficit and runaway inflation;

    - the increasing difficulty in obtaining a clear and comprehensive picture of public spending as a whole;

    - the lack of anti-corruption commitments which has prevented Hungary from receiving EU funds;

    - clientele close to the NER which has been able to profit from both pandemic procurements and traditional public procurements; and

    - meanwhile, the state’s lavish support of its own knowledge centres with tourism funds, with a significant part of the subsidies for tourism development going to the clientele

    3. Entire sectors have fallen into FIDESZ-allied hands:

      • by outsourcing higher education and certain public social services to public trust funds (”KEKVA’s”);

      • with large amounts of wealth allocated to church institutions; and

      • important sectors have been given to pro-government businessmen, while the Government itself has tried to push foreign investors out of Hungary by breaking the rules of fair competition.

      4. The government has taken revenue from municipalities on the grounds of pandemic control, and then selectively rewarded municipalities run by pro-government administration

      5. Decisions and revenues belonging to opposition-led municipalities were transferred to county assemblies with a governing- party majority by the creation of special commercial zones.

      6. Public positions of power have been privatised, Deputy Minister of Justice Pál Völner is suspected of making the filling of independent court bailiff posts conditional on bribes.

      Corruption Monitor - Summary from March 2020 to March 2022

      donwload »

      Share

      Related articles

      Hungary Classifies All Information Regarding Paks Nuclear Plant

      Five NGOs, including the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, have addressed an open letter to Hungary's president after the draft law on the maintenance of the Paks Nuclear Power Plant was passed by the Parliament.

      Disrespect for European Values in Hungary - 2010-2014

      A comprehensive analysis titled Disrespect for European Values in Hungary, 2010-2014 summarises how measures taken by the Hungarian government in the past four years have eroded respect for the fundamental values of the European Union in Hungary.

      Inadequate response to the Venice Commission’s criticism

      In March 2012 the Venice Commission issued an opinion regarding the new Hungarian cardinal laws on the court system and the judiciary, stating that “the reform as a whole threatens the independence of the judiciary”. The Hungarian Government has initiated an amendment of the two cardinal laws in question, apparently as a result of the Venice Commission’s opinion. However, the proposed amendments do not eliminate the conceptional problems of the new regulation.