Declaration of Protest

Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) has been informed with revelation that Gatter László, the head of the Metropolitan Court of Budapest, denounced certain leaders of the Communist Party (Munkáspárt) for slander, since one of the court’s sentence, delivered in connection with an internal debate of the Labour Party, was called “political” by the Party’s web site.

Press Statement

Freedom of criticism and expressing opinion is one of the milestones that define an open society. It is particularly important in an open, democratic society to let citizens express their opinion about the activity of public power establishments without fear and danger of penalty. The No. 30/1992. statement of the Constitutional Court shares this approach as well.

It is a definite viewpoint of HCLU that citizens should be allowed to form their opinion freely, even if that is without base, on the decision carried out by any public power organization, thus also about judicial sentences, and to assess those. HCLU requires self-discipline in expressing opinion on the judicial sentences only from public people of other public power fields – such as members of parliament and governmental functionaries.

HCLU supposes that the bench’s respect would be guaranteed if high-positioned judges were not involved in everyday political debates and if they could welcome the criticism regarding the activity of the court with some liberality. It is rather saddening that it is the court itself - keeping the political rights of freedom impartially, based on its constitutional function - which reaches out, through its leaders, to devices of penal statues in order to press down criticism.

HCLU finds it especially worrying that lately some public power organizations and public people have constantly tried to block freedom of expression of opinion – by hiding behind their positive reputation. HCLU requires from Gatter László to withdraw his denunciation and at the same time it offers free legal help for the denounced leaders of Communist Party.

Budapest, 28-November-2005

dr. Dénes Balázs
Executive Director of HCLU

 

Share

Related articles

The Third Wave – the New Constitution of Hungary

In their current, third analysis on the legislative work of the Hungarian Parliament,  the Eötvös Károly Policy Institute, the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) and the Hungarian Helsinki Committee (HHC) examine whether the constitution-making process in Hungary meets the requirements deriving from the principle of the rule of law and compares the draft “Fundamental Law” (i.e. the draft of the new Constitution) submitted to the Parliament on 14 March 2011 with the present constitutional system.

HCLU protests against the proposed new media legislation

The new media-press regulation plan is unfounded, and fails to meet established European freedom of press standards. Moreover, the so-called “media package” sponsored by two right-wing MPs from the governing party (Antal Rogán, András Cser-Palkovics), contains bills with several unconstitutional clauses. The bills would bring about significant changes to the functioning of printed press, television, radio and part of the internet as well. The HCLU disapproves of the process by which the new parliamentary majority has gone about building a completely new regulation plan without any previous consultation, open debate with stakeholders, experts or journalists.  This is foolhardy at best, since the bills represent an attempt at a far-reaching overhaul in media regulation.

Executive Board of the Labour Party Acquitted

Upon the initiation of the President of Capitol Court, criminal proceedings were started against the Executive Board of the Labour Party for defamation. According to the accusation and later the arraignment, 7 members of the Board have committed the act of defamation. The Party – in a statement - deemed a verdict of the Capitol Court a ’political decision’ and ’revenge of power’.