Executive Board of the Labour Party Acquitted

Upon the initiation of the President of Capitol Court, criminal proceedings were started against the Executive Board of the Labour Party for defamation. According to the accusation and later the arraignment, 7 members of the Board have committed the act of defamation. The Party – in a statement - deemed a verdict of the Capitol Court a ’political decision’ and ’revenge of power’.

The President of the Board was represented by HCLU’s lawyer, since we believe that the statement was an opinion regarding the decision of the Court which is not grounds for initiating and conducting criminal proceedings.

The HCLU believes that in a democracy, everyone has the right to freely express his/her opinion on decisions of the courts and that this right cannot be restricted by criminal law.

In its first instance decision, the Court of Székesfehérvár concluded that the Party’s statement was not an opinion, but rather a statement directly implying untruthful fact. Therefore the act of defamation has been realized.

However, the Court of Székesfehérvár was wrong and its decision was overturned. In the Court’s second instance decision, all defendants were acquitted. The Court found that the statement of the Party was not opprobrious, was not defamatory and that reputations of the courts cannot be determined by political statements.

In this absurd case, none other than the President of the Capitol Court initiated legal proceedings. The HCLU is happy to acknowledge that the Court of Székesfehérvár was able to rise above the person of the plaintiff.

Share

Related articles

NGOs Call for Advertising Boycott over Anti-Roma Statements in Hungarian Media

The Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) is joining with a coalition of Hungarian NGOs are calling on domestic companies and Hungarian divisions of multinationals to take a stand against hate speech in Hungary. The NGOS are asking, among others, Vodafone and T-Com, FEDEX, IKEA and Procter and Gamble to reconsider advertising in a Hungarian newspaper which published an article talking about Romani people in unacceptably racist and prejudiced language.

Constitution-concerns of the Hungarian Judiciary Elite

Leading Hungarian NGOs, Transparency International Hungary and the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union besides expressing their criticism about the new Hungarian Constitution and the Constitution-writing process, wish to express their deep concern regarding the recent initiatives of the parliamentary majority to radically encroach upon the independence of the judiciary system.

The Third Wave – the New Constitution of Hungary

In their current, third analysis on the legislative work of the Hungarian Parliament, the Eötvös Károly Policy Institute, the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) and the Hungarian Helsinki Committee (HHC) examine whether the constitution-making process in Hungary meets the requirements deriving from the principle of the rule of law and compares the draft “Fundamental Law” (i.e. the draft of the new Constitution) submitted to the Parliament on 14 March 2011 with the present constitutional system.