Freedom of speech triumphs over Auchan Hungary Ltd.

The Budapest Court of Appeal has reversed the verdict of first instance on 14 Sept, 2006, in the case of Auchan Hungary Limited versus The Clean Air Action Group. According to the decision, András Lukács, President of The Clean Air Action Group was not guilty of defamation as originally charged. András Lukács was represented by Environmental Management and Law Association (EMLA) and HCLU.

Auchan sued András Lukács in May, 2005 after he had published his writing titled „The miracles of Auchan” in the principal Hungarian daily. The article dealt with the multinational firm’s investments and its relationship with authorities focusing on the anomalies relating to the firm’s building license.

The verdict of first instance was a judgment for the suitor, obligating the defendant to release a statement in which he admits the fact of violating the law and also paying 1 million HUF compensation.

On the trial of second instance today, the Budapest Court of Appeal changed the decision and dismissed the suitor’s plaint as a final judgment. The court agreed with the defendant’s arguments saying the article expressed the author’s opinion and not facts.

In such cases the court should examine whether the opinion is valid or hurtfully humiliating. The court has pointed out what the spokesperson of Auchan has also admitted that there have been anomalies within the building licensing process and also that the prosecutor’s investigation has the same result. Considering these facts mentioned above, one cannot say the opinion was not well-founded.

In the judicial practice, following the Constitutional Court’s interpretation, the court does not examine the value of the opinion when the criteria of validity is fulfilled since in the Republic of Hungary everyone has the right to express his opinion in public affairs.

HCLU welcomes this interpretation of law of the Budapest Court of Appeal otherwise in such cases examining relationship of multinational firms and public authorities, when testifying is quite difficult, one could not express his opinion without having specific evidences.

Environmental Management and Law Association

 

 

Share

Related articles

The Third Wave – the New Constitution of Hungary

In their current, third analysis on the legislative work of the Hungarian Parliament,  the Eötvös Károly Policy Institute, the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) and the Hungarian Helsinki Committee (HHC) examine whether the constitution-making process in Hungary meets the requirements deriving from the principle of the rule of law and compares the draft “Fundamental Law” (i.e. the draft of the new Constitution) submitted to the Parliament on 14 March 2011 with the present constitutional system.

HCLU protests against the proposed new media legislation

The new media-press regulation plan is unfounded, and fails to meet established European freedom of press standards. Moreover, the so-called “media package” sponsored by two right-wing MPs from the governing party (Antal Rogán, András Cser-Palkovics), contains bills with several unconstitutional clauses. The bills would bring about significant changes to the functioning of printed press, television, radio and part of the internet as well. The HCLU disapproves of the process by which the new parliamentary majority has gone about building a completely new regulation plan without any previous consultation, open debate with stakeholders, experts or journalists.  This is foolhardy at best, since the bills represent an attempt at a far-reaching overhaul in media regulation.

Executive Board of the Labour Party Acquitted

Upon the initiation of the President of Capitol Court, criminal proceedings were started against the Executive Board of the Labour Party for defamation. According to the accusation and later the arraignment, 7 members of the Board have committed the act of defamation. The Party – in a statement - deemed a verdict of the Capitol Court a ’political decision’ and ’revenge of power’.