Freedom of Speech vs. Metropolitan Court: 0-1

Yesterday, the Court of Székesfehérvár has returned its first instance decision in the lawsuit against members of the board of the Labour Party. Freedom of Speech lost….Read on for the deatails!

As we have previously reported, a report by the President of the Metropolitan Court against board members of the Labour Party has resulted in a criminal lawsuit. According to the report and also the arraignment, seven members of the board have committed the act of defamation. The party has issued a declaration with regard to a previous verdict of the Metropolitan Court, in which, besides other things, members of the board claim that the Metropolitan Court’s decision was ’political’. The chairman of the board was represented by an HCLU attorney, because we feel, that the declaration drafts an opinion on the verdict, which cannot be grounds for initiation of a criminal lawsuit.

It is the HCLU’s opinion, that in a democratic and constitutional state, everyone has the right to form an opinion, even if it is contrary to the court’s opinion. Therefore, Freedom of Speech cannot be restricted by criminal tools, or any other legal means.

The Court of Székesfehérvár has concluded, that the declaration did not form an opinion, but stated a fact, which was untrue, therefore the act of defamation was realized. The penalty is 2 years probation for all seven members of the board.

The verdict is not final, all defendants have appealed.

 

Share

Related articles

Journalist Wins Defamation Lawsuit

Lajos Gubcsi, former Director of Zrínyi Media Ltd. – a background institution of the Ministry of National Defense – initiated a defamation lawsuit against József Spirk, journalist of Index.hu, the leading online news provider in Hungary. The HCLU’s Legal Aid Service provided legal representation. The court ruled that facts written in the article were well-founded and as a result ruled in favor of the journalist. The ruling is final.

Five NGOs’ Joint Letter to the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe

The Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, Transparency International Hungary, K-Monitor, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee and the Eötvös Károly Institute turned to the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe to obtain its position regarding the amendment of the Constitution which would rectrict the Constitutional Court’s power.

Freedom of speech triumphs over Auchan Hungary Ltd.

The Budapest Court of Appeal has reversed the verdict of first instance on 14 Sept, 2006, in the case of Auchan Hungary Limited versus The Clean Air Action Group. According to the decision, András Lukács, President of The Clean Air Action Group was not guilty of defamation as originally charged. András Lukács was represented by Environmental Management and Law Association (EMLA) and HCLU.