Freedom of Speech vs. Metropolitan Court: 0-1

Yesterday, the Court of Székesfehérvár has returned its first instance decision in the lawsuit against members of the board of the Labour Party. Freedom of Speech lost….Read on for the deatails!

As we have previously reported, a report by the President of the Metropolitan Court against board members of the Labour Party has resulted in a criminal lawsuit. According to the report and also the arraignment, seven members of the board have committed the act of defamation. The party has issued a declaration with regard to a previous verdict of the Metropolitan Court, in which, besides other things, members of the board claim that the Metropolitan Court’s decision was ’political’. The chairman of the board was represented by an HCLU attorney, because we feel, that the declaration drafts an opinion on the verdict, which cannot be grounds for initiation of a criminal lawsuit.

It is the HCLU’s opinion, that in a democratic and constitutional state, everyone has the right to form an opinion, even if it is contrary to the court’s opinion. Therefore, Freedom of Speech cannot be restricted by criminal tools, or any other legal means.

The Court of Székesfehérvár has concluded, that the declaration did not form an opinion, but stated a fact, which was untrue, therefore the act of defamation was realized. The penalty is 2 years probation for all seven members of the board.

The verdict is not final, all defendants have appealed.

 

Share

Related articles

NGOs Call for Advertising Boycott over Anti-Roma Statements in Hungarian Media

The Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) is joining with a coalition of Hungarian NGOs are calling on domestic companies and Hungarian divisions of multinationals to take a stand against hate speech in Hungary. The NGOS are asking, among others, Vodafone and T-Com, FEDEX, IKEA and Procter and Gamble to reconsider advertising in a Hungarian newspaper which published an article talking about Romani people in unacceptably racist and prejudiced language.

Constitution-concerns of the Hungarian Judiciary Elite

Leading Hungarian NGOs, Transparency International Hungary and the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union besides expressing their criticism about the new Hungarian Constitution and the Constitution-writing process, wish to express their deep concern regarding the recent initiatives of the parliamentary majority to radically encroach upon the independence of the judiciary system.

The Third Wave – the New Constitution of Hungary

In their current, third analysis on the legislative work of the Hungarian Parliament, the Eötvös Károly Policy Institute, the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) and the Hungarian Helsinki Committee (HHC) examine whether the constitution-making process in Hungary meets the requirements deriving from the principle of the rule of law and compares the draft “Fundamental Law” (i.e. the draft of the new Constitution) submitted to the Parliament on 14 March 2011 with the present constitutional system.