Handlers of Public Interest Data are not to Practice "Goodwill"

Some municipalities have a unique way of interpreting the constitutional right to form an opinion and the requirements of disclosing public interest data. The city of Rétság serves as an example to this.

Beside the city municipality’s webpage www.retsag.hu, Károly Girasek, local resident, operated his own website, www.retsag.net. The municipality's request that the court liquidate the website operated by Girasek was based upon grounds of infringement of personal rights.

The municipality argued  that Girasek had no right to relay, make public, or copy data from the municipality’s webpage onto his own. Girasek turned to the Data Protection and Freedom of Information Ombudsman to settle the matter. Girasek's position, citing Act LXIII. of year 1992. is as follows: "by disclosing public interest data, the handler of public interest data is not practicing ’goodwill’, but rather fulfilling his lawful duty...Information may freely be used for any purpose, may be relayed to others and may be published on other websites and through the media...A body fulfilling public function is acting in an unlawful manner by considering public interest data to be of personal property.”

Despite the Ombudsman’s clear stance, the municipality is still seeking ways to restrict the public and to refuse access to public interest data

Share

Related articles

Profit-making through FOI?

A draft bill on the re-use of public sector information submitted to the Hungarian Parliament by the government would make the national FOI legislation highly unpredictable - according to the HCLU and K-Monitor, major Hungarian NGOs working for transparency and freedom of information. The proposal intends to harmonize Hungarian freedom of information legislation with the EU law by implementing the 2003/98/EC Directive on the re-use of public sector information. The latter is to be revised soon, due to a proposal of the European Commission. The HCLU and K-Monitor ask legislative authorities to withdraw their draft proposal due to the following reasons.

Hungarian NGOs turn to Barroso over planned removal of Hungarian data protection commissioner

Eötvös Károly Policy Institute, Hungarian Civil Liberties Union and Hungarian Helsinki Committee informed the President of the European Commission on the failure of the Hungarian lawmaker to fulfill its obligation to guarantee the complete independence of the Data Protection Commissioner. Hungary therefore breached its duty arising from EU law.

Whistleblower Protection in Central and Eastern Europe

K-Monitor Association and the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union organized a project on Legal Regulation of Public Interest Disclosures in Post-Soviet Democracies. The two Hungarian NGOs created a virtual conference on whistleblowing protection with an interactive discussion surface in English as well as an online content in form of this website. For the implementation of the “virtual conference”, K-Monitor and HCLU also invited NGOs working in the field of anti-corruption from Bosnia, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia, Poland, Moldova and Hungary to take part in the project.