Handlers of Public Interest Data are not to Practice "Goodwill"

Some municipalities have a unique way of interpreting the constitutional right to form an opinion and the requirements of disclosing public interest data. The city of Rétság serves as an example to this.

Beside the city municipality’s webpage www.retsag.hu, Károly Girasek, local resident, operated his own website, www.retsag.net. The municipality's request that the court liquidate the website operated by Girasek was based upon grounds of infringement of personal rights.

The municipality argued  that Girasek had no right to relay, make public, or copy data from the municipality’s webpage onto his own. Girasek turned to the Data Protection and Freedom of Information Ombudsman to settle the matter. Girasek's position, citing Act LXIII. of year 1992. is as follows: "by disclosing public interest data, the handler of public interest data is not practicing ’goodwill’, but rather fulfilling his lawful duty...Information may freely be used for any purpose, may be relayed to others and may be published on other websites and through the media...A body fulfilling public function is acting in an unlawful manner by considering public interest data to be of personal property.”

Despite the Ombudsman’s clear stance, the municipality is still seeking ways to restrict the public and to refuse access to public interest data

Share

Related articles

The state, too, can access my phone records?

In its judgement, the Court of Justice of the European Union has declared the Data Retention Directive invalid. Based on the Directive, service providers were keeping phone records and other personal data for 6 months. We have decided to undertake the lengthy process of actually eliminating this European law in Hungary.

Liberty represents global partners in privacy claim against British Intelligence Services

(LONDON – 8 November 2013)Today Liberty announced it will represent an international coalition of partner human rights organisations in a new legal claim against the British Intelligence Services over their role in the ongoing privacy scandal.

Once again the public is left out of the preparatory process of the Draft of the Act on Classified Information

The HCLU has offered its opinion on the Draft of the Act and has prepared a top ten list of its most serious short-comings. The wording of the most recent, August issue of the Draft falls below the standards acceptable from a classifying system in a democratic society.