Handlers of Public Interest Data are not to Practice "Goodwill"

Some municipalities have a unique way of interpreting the constitutional right to form an opinion and the requirements of disclosing public interest data. The city of Rétság serves as an example to this.

Beside the city municipality’s webpage www.retsag.hu, Károly Girasek, local resident, operated his own website, www.retsag.net. The municipality's request that the court liquidate the website operated by Girasek was based upon grounds of infringement of personal rights.

The municipality argued  that Girasek had no right to relay, make public, or copy data from the municipality’s webpage onto his own. Girasek turned to the Data Protection and Freedom of Information Ombudsman to settle the matter. Girasek's position, citing Act LXIII. of year 1992. is as follows: "by disclosing public interest data, the handler of public interest data is not practicing ’goodwill’, but rather fulfilling his lawful duty...Information may freely be used for any purpose, may be relayed to others and may be published on other websites and through the media...A body fulfilling public function is acting in an unlawful manner by considering public interest data to be of personal property.”

Despite the Ombudsman’s clear stance, the municipality is still seeking ways to restrict the public and to refuse access to public interest data

Share

Related articles

Hungary's Weak New Anti-Corruption Program

The Hungarian government has devised a new anti-corruption program, which, as opposed to reducing corruption, in fact increases the government's power. Compared with earlier plans, reforms concerning the financing of parties and the protection of whistleblowers have been excluded from the program, which also fails to deal with the asset declarations of MPs. The civil and the business sectors, in turn, are facing stricter regulations in the future.

Double success: freedom of information and HCLU won!

The Metropolitan Appellate Court (Fővárosi Ítélőtábla) delivered its final judgment on appeal in the case against the Hungarian Official Gazette on March 2, 2006. The appellate court changed the verdict of the court of the first instance in favor of the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU).

Hungary Classifies All Information Regarding Paks Nuclear Plant

Five NGOs, including the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, have addressed an open letter to Hungary's president after the draft law on the maintenance of the Paks Nuclear Power Plant was passed by the Parliament. The NGOs demand that President János Áder initiate a constitutional review of the law before the Constitutional Court. The NGOs are concerned because the new act severely limits access to public interest data by rendering all information concerning the Paks plant as classified data for the next 30 years. Opposition parties have joined the organizations in attacking the decision.