HCLU is Defending the Activists Who Peacefully Disobeyed

Lawyers from HCLU are defending a number of young activists who have recently been charged for occupying the headquarters of the governing party, FIDESZ and for blocking traffic around the Hungarian Parliament. The response by the police to the demonstrations was meant to instill fear and to scare people away from similar acts in the future.

WATCH THE VIDEO OF THE PRESS CONFERENCE: (you can turn on English subtitles by starting the video and then clicking on the 'cc' button)

On March 7 a group of young activists occupied the party headquarters of FIDESZ to demonstrate against the fourth amendment to the Fundamental Law. On March 11 – the day the amendment was adopted – the group blocked traffic by the parking lot at Kossuth Square in an attempt to prevent some Members of Parliament from entering Parliament. 

The activists acted in defense of democracy and fundamental rights in a public and peaceful manner. They went beyond their basic right to assemble in order to call attention to an emerging injustice. However, they did not use force, cause any personal injury or material damage, or violate anyone’s fundamental rights. They publicly justified their actions and accepted all legal consequences. 

HCLU noted that the activists went beyond the limits of the law on peaceful assembly, but did not commit any crime. Even if one could find a law that prohibits their peaceful demonstration, they could not be prosecuted for their actions. In a general manner, and in specific cases, the Parliament and courts have provided immunity for civil disobedience during the history of the Hungarian democratic and rule of law state. Therefore, lawyers from HCLU believe that the courts cannot find the activists guilty.

HCLU emphasizes, the police’s actions to round-up and detain the activists were unreasonable and unnecessary and meant to instill fear and scare people away from similar actions in the future. The actions of the police send a clear message; the emerging autocratic regime seeks to break any democratic movement in its infancy.

As Andrea Pelle, the head of HCLU’s legal aid program, noted: “The activists did not commit any crime, and their actions were not a danger to society, therefore they should not be punished.” 

Share

Related articles

Insite - Not Just Injecting, But Connecting

Insite is an injecting site - and so much more. Please watch our movie and learn why the Canadian government should not shut it down!

Pride is Free, Court Puts Police Back in Its Place

On 23 April the Tribunal of the Capiptal overruled and repealed the decision of the Budapest Police Chief, which had previously banned the Budapest Pride March. Similarly to last year, the court accepted the arguments of the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union's lawyer and rejected the 13-page-long justification of the police. The court ruled that there is no valid legal reason to prohibit the Pride March on the announced route.

HCLU protests against the proposed new media legislation

The new media-press regulation plan is unfounded, and fails to meet established European freedom of press standards. Moreover, the so-called “media package” sponsored by two right-wing MPs from the governing party (Antal Rogán, András Cser-Palkovics), contains bills with several unconstitutional clauses. The bills would bring about significant changes to the functioning of printed press, television, radio and part of the internet as well. The HCLU disapproves of the process by which the new parliamentary majority has gone about building a completely new regulation plan without any previous consultation, open debate with stakeholders, experts or journalists. This is foolhardy at best, since the bills represent an attempt at a far-reaching overhaul in media regulation.