HCLU is Defending the Activists Who Peacefully Disobeyed

Lawyers from HCLU are defending a number of young activists who have recently been charged for occupying the headquarters of the governing party, FIDESZ and for blocking traffic around the Hungarian Parliament. The response by the police to the demonstrations was meant to instill fear and to scare people away from similar acts in the future.

WATCH THE VIDEO OF THE PRESS CONFERENCE: (you can turn on English subtitles by starting the video and then clicking on the 'cc' button)

On March 7 a group of young activists occupied the party headquarters of FIDESZ to demonstrate against the fourth amendment to the Fundamental Law. On March 11 – the day the amendment was adopted – the group blocked traffic by the parking lot at Kossuth Square in an attempt to prevent some Members of Parliament from entering Parliament. 

The activists acted in defense of democracy and fundamental rights in a public and peaceful manner. They went beyond their basic right to assemble in order to call attention to an emerging injustice. However, they did not use force, cause any personal injury or material damage, or violate anyone’s fundamental rights. They publicly justified their actions and accepted all legal consequences. 

HCLU noted that the activists went beyond the limits of the law on peaceful assembly, but did not commit any crime. Even if one could find a law that prohibits their peaceful demonstration, they could not be prosecuted for their actions. In a general manner, and in specific cases, the Parliament and courts have provided immunity for civil disobedience during the history of the Hungarian democratic and rule of law state. Therefore, lawyers from HCLU believe that the courts cannot find the activists guilty.

HCLU emphasizes, the police’s actions to round-up and detain the activists were unreasonable and unnecessary and meant to instill fear and scare people away from similar actions in the future. The actions of the police send a clear message; the emerging autocratic regime seeks to break any democratic movement in its infancy.

As Andrea Pelle, the head of HCLU’s legal aid program, noted: “The activists did not commit any crime, and their actions were not a danger to society, therefore they should not be punished.” 

Share

Related articles

Churches Deprived of Liberty Await Compensation from the Hungarian Government

The Hungarian government has failed to reach a satisfactory agreement on compensation with nine disenfranchised churches, leaving the matter to the European Court of Human Rights to decide.

Abolishing the age limit regarding Constitutional Court judges

The Eötvös Károly Institute, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee and the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union criticize the abolishing of the upper age limit of 70 years in case of elected Constitutional Court judges, including current serving judges.

HCLU vs. Police: the trial of discrimination against Roma

On June 13, 2013 the trial of the actio popularis against the Heves County Police begins at the County Court of Eger. The lawsuit was initiated by the HCLU against the Police for discriminating against the Roma in Gyöngyöspata based on their ethnicity and skin color during and following the extremist “patrols” of 2011. At stake: will the court hold the state responsible for the discriminative treatment of the Roma?