HCLU on the Corruption Package

The HCLU sent its opinion to the Members of Parliament on the draft amendment submitted by the government, which aims to establish new institutions in its fight against corruption.

Considering that within the current legal frame competent authorities are unable to reach results in the fight against corruption, we believe it is necessary to establish a strong, legally authorized institution to better this bitter situation. We especially welcome regulation on the protection of those who report malpractices, as this will lead to more citizens disclosing information on behalf of the public.

Besides its many positive elements, the package does need supplementation. In its opinion sent to MPs, the HCLU suggested to extend the legal range of territories, as it currently excludes many territories where corruption is flourishing. The HCLU also have strong concerns about the regulation on the election of the director of the new institution, which foreshadow that the director may not be politically unattached.

It is a regrettable, that despite the thorough amendment on laws regulating lobbying being present in the original draft, it was excluded from the text submitted to the Parliament. In 2009, only 33 substantive reports reached the competent Ministry of Justice. This reflects the malfunctions of the lobby regulations, even though it is clear that the number of those trying to validate their business interests through contacting decision makers is much higher.

Share

Related articles

Landmark decision on freedom of information by the European Court of Human Rights

The Hungarian Civil Liberties Union won a freedom of information case against the Republic of Hungary. For the first time, the right to access to state-held information as part of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights has been formally recognized, as reflected in today’s ruling by the European Court of Human Rights. The Strasbourg based Court declared that withholding information needed to participate in public debate on matters of public importance may violate the freedom of expression.

HCLU wins case against the Ministry of Finance

The case was started against the Ministry of Finance after it denied access to data on public spending deficit of a hundred billion HUF.

HCLU Wins Landmark Freedom of Information Case

The Hungarian Ministry of Development and Economics is ordered to disclose data, which reveal what investments worth 200 billion Hungarian forints – nearly 800 million euros - were carried out by Swedish companies in exchange for the purchase of Gripen fighter-jets by the Hungarian Air Force. The journalist of on-line newspaper, origo.hu – with legal representation provided by the HCLU - has initiated a Freedom of Information lawsuit in December, 2007, because the Ministry has previously rejected to provide information to the journalist’s FOI request. According to the September 8th ruling of the Regional Court of Appeals, the defendant Ministry acted unlawfully.