On June 13, 2013 the trial of the actio popularis against the Heves County Police begins at the County Court of Eger. The lawsuit was initiated by the HCLU against the Police for discriminating against the Roma in Gyöngyöspata based on their ethnicity and skin color during and following the extremist “patrols” of 2011. At stake: will the court hold the state responsible for the discriminative treatment of the Roma?
As it is publicly known, in the Spring of 2011, extremist, paramilitary, anti-Roma organizations (Civil Guard Association for a Better Future, Defence Force, and Scamp Army) were intimidating Gyöngyöspata’s Roma population in Heves County, while the Hungarian government watched this for weeks without any attempt to intervene and stop usurpation of the state’s monopoly to use force. Based on its experience from active fieldwork, the HCLU continuously and strongly criticized the failures of the government, the leadership within the Ministry of the Interior and the Police from the onset of the crisis until the Parliamentary Committee published its findings.
The Ombudsman for National and Ethnic Minority Rights also pointed out in his report, - published in April 2011 -, that the police failed to apply the relevant laws against the extremists.
You can turn on the English subtitles by starting the video and then clicking on the "cc" button
Meanwhile, the police began the practice of fining the Roma mostly for bagatelle traffic violations, while the extremists were never fined for similar minor offences, a practice that has increased tensions and exacerbated the fearsome and humiliating atmosphere that the Roma faced.
Following a group fight on April 26, 2011, the extremists left the areas populated by Roma, still the local Roma could not feel secure. The city elected a far-right extremist ( a candidate of Jobbik, the extreme right-wing political party in the Hungarian Parliament) as its mayor, while the police carried on with its ethnic profiling activities until the end of the year. Ernő Kállai, the Ombudsman for Minority Rights, analyzed this practice in a follow-up report, published in December 2011, and surmised violation of the law on equal treatment by the Police.
The HCLU sued the Heves County Police based on the reports of the Ombudsman and its own experience from fieldwork (given that the Gyöngyös Police is not a legal entity, only the County Police could be sued). The law on equal treatment enables civil society organizations to file a lawsuit on their own (an actio popularis) if all the victims of unequal treatment cannot be identified.
In our court filing, we state that the Police failed to protect the Roma community against the militant groups during the extremist patrols and thereby facilitated harassment of the Roma, violating the law on equal treatment. The police undermined the Roma’s sense of security and faith in law and order, while empathizing with the extremists, and did not guarantee public safety by crime prevention and maintening public order. The police exacerbated the atmosphere of fear, hostility, humiliation, and shame created by the extremists by labeling the Roma as criminals.
Article 10(1) of Act CXXV of 20031 on Equal Treatment and the Promotion of Equal Opportunities states that:
“Harassment is a conduct violating human dignity related to the relevant person’s characteristic defined in Article 8 with the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment around a particular person.”
The HCLU analyzed the police’s lack of action in detail in a legal assessment published in May 2011. We also produced a video in March 2011 demonstrating the atmosphere of fear, hostility, humiliation and shame facing the Roma.
The HCLU also states in its actio popularis that the police violated the Roma’s right to equal treatment with its practice on initiating minor offence cases against members of the Roma community and issuing fines between March 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011. The ethnically disproportionate fining practice, which the expert literature calls ethnic profiling, realizes direct discrimination and harassment according to the law on equal treatment.
The court filing by the HCLU can be accessed here in Hungarian.
The first date of the trial will be on June 13, 2013, at 1 pm at the County Court of Eger (Barkóczy street 1, Eger) in Courtroom no.58, on the first floor.
The local branch of the ’Jobbik’ party in Monor (a town in Hungary), has an ongoing collection for the benefit of flood victims. The flood has damaged 17 houses in the township, of which 5 are inhabited by Gypsies.
A ’Jobbik’ party activist, in charge of distributing donations, has not given any aid to the Gypsy victims- clearly stating it was due to their lineage. She had apportioned parts of the donations for non-Gypsy born people who were not affected by the flood, but were considered ’Jobbik’ voters. Online descriptions of the donations emphasize that the contents will only benefit ’Hungarians.’
Orosz Béla was fined 50 thousand forints for a minor offence. In a letter sent on August 8th, he informed the police that because of his poverty, he cannot pay the fine, but would like to work off his debts through community service. He did not receive a response from the police. Two months later, the courts informed him that they will hold a hearing regarding the conversion of his fine into a prison sentence. This procedure is illegal; the judicial authorities disregarded the laws relating to offences.
HCLU (Hungarian Civil Liberties Union) and ERRC (European Roma Rights Center) have called into account Máté Szabó, Parliamentary Commissioner of Civil Rights in Hungary, with a corporate submission in order to conduct an investigation, and gain an explanation as to why people living in abject poverty are being evicted from local governments’ tenements- the equivalent of making them homeless. Specialists of HCLU Roma Programme, doing fieldwork in Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplém county (Hungary), have received numerous annunciations from Roma families who had been evicted or were on the verge of being evicted by the local governments.