HCLU Wins Lawsuit Against the Forensic Institute for the Observation and Treatment of the Mentally Ill (FIOTM)

As we have reported, a client represented by the HCLU has recently started prodeedings against the Forensic Institute for the Observation and Treatment of the Mentally Ill (FIOTM), to have the courts determine: the FIOTM has violated his personal rights, when they placed him in an institution without a non-smoking ward and subjected him to unnecessary therapy.

The first instance decision in this lawsuit only found part of the charges valid, but later on February 16th, the Metropolitan Court in its second instance decision found all charges valid and also determined the violation of rights. For the HCLU the decision is important because it states that the FIOTM also has to abide by the laws of healthcare regarding therapy, especially concerning the principles of informed consent.

Our client was taken to FIOTM from pre-trial detention but not due to pschycological symptoms. There, despite being a non-smoker and objecting to such treatment, he was placed in a ward with smokers. During the lawsuit the first instance decision clearly stated that FIOTM, although bound by the laws of healthcare and protection of non-smokers, does not possess hospital-wards where non-smokers can be placed. This means that on the premises of the institution the smoking areas are not designated - there is simply no place where non-smokers can exist in a smoke-free environment.

In accordance with the second degree final court decision the institution is obligated to eliminate the ongoing situation. These efforts will be monitored closely by the HCLU.

During the time spent at FIOTM, our client, despite the documentation of his medical record and his continuous objection, was subject to therapy which should not have been medically administered. After becoming ill, he was promised not to be subject to this type of therapy again. Two days later the therapy was repeated, despite the continuous objections of our client. The court, after hearing evidence determined the therapy to be a violation of human rights.

Share

Related articles

The government has no voice in family planning!

With its latest measures aiming to tighten regulations on medical sterilization, the government is about to intrude into the private lives of citizens. The proposal is another attempt at increasing the number of births – however, similarly to abortion regulations, the planned restrictions are not only inexpedient, but they also violate basic rights.

Aggravation of Abortion? – Problems, typical of the whole of the Constitution framing process, around the protection of the right to life of the fetus

 Last year one of the first news about the text of the new Constitution was about the extension of right to life to the fetus. The bill submitted to the Parliament is about the protection of the right to life of the fetus. The nontransparent framing process of the Constitution and the lack of real public debate make it impossible to have a clear view on this issue. On March 31 HCLU and Patent Association gave out a joint press release.

Co-operation Instead of Hostility

The Doctors for Free and Safe Birth have issued a declaration regarding Home Birth. Read it!