HCLU’s Boycott: The Unlawful NGO Act is Bound to Fail

The Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) denounces the unlawful NGO Act, even in its final version. According to the watchdog organization, the bill should not have been adopted at all, as it violates fundamental rights. The organization believes that the most effective way of acting against the unlawful provisions is not to abide the law the. They underline that, given their economic management is already fully transparent, this would not violate anyone’s rights or the demand of transparency.

HCLU warns that similar laws were adopted in Russia and Israel in the disguise of transparency, which aim at silencing NGOs providing critical services and monitoring government’s human rights trackrecord. The now adopted Hungarian NGO Act is a carbon-copy of Putin’s foreign agent law. This law was followed by multiple amendment restricting the rights and activities of NGOs and resulting in 27 organizations closing down since the law was adopted.

HCLU holds that the right to the freedom of speech and of association are infringed by the unlawful act that also discriminates unconstitutionally certain civil society organizations. The organization stresses that the current regulations are much more effective in guaranteeing transparency and national security, or acting against money laundering. Transparency is ensured by the requirement from civil society organizations to publish their financial data, also indicating the sources of support. While national security and the fight against money laundering are served not by publicity but by the appropriate functioning of institutions dedicated for such purposes, like the Public Prosecutor’s Office. Hence, HCLU maintains that the requirements set by the new act are both unnecessary and disproportionate.

Based on HCLU’s interpretation, it is not them but the NGO Act that infringes rights. They see the most effective way of acting against the unlawful act in not abiding its illegitimate provisions. The organization is ready to exploit all the available legal remedies: should proceedings be initiated against it, HCLU will enforce its rights in court against the act, seeking justice at the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights as well.

The organization reiterates that it has nothing to hide: its management and operations are entirely transparent; anyone may trace, several years back, what kinds of programs have been accomplished, from whose support, and with what budget. HCLU still encourages everybody to donate regularly who wants to live in a country where those in power respect citizens’ rights. HCLU’s operation is a lot more transparent now than it would be when stigmatized as an “ organization supported from abroad”, therefore it will go on informing the public in the current way.

'A part of legal remedies opens up for us only if we do not comply with the requirements of the unlawful act. Unwilling to give up on any means of redress, we have decided not to fulfill the requirements of the unlawful act,' said Máté Szabó, HCLU’s Director of Programs.

'We are aware of the possibility that legal proceedings may be instituted against us. We are not afraid of these: year by year, we represent our clients whose fundamental rights have been violated in hundreds of cases at the Hungarian courts, the Constitutional Court and the Strasbourg Court; we are experienced in such proceedings. In order to help civil society, other foundations and associations, we must ride for a fall, proving on ourselves that the act violates rights. We  are convinced that, in the course of lengthy proceedings, the unlawful NGO Act will fail,' said Stefánia Kapronczay, HCLU’s Executive Director.

HCLU’s transparency is served not by being stigmatized as an “organization supported from abroad” but by the fact that it publishes its detailed financial data many years back.

All you need to know about the Civil Act.

More about the impact of the Russian foreign agent legislation: https://www.amnestyusa.org/reports/agents-of-the-people-four-years-of-foreign-agents-law-in-russia/

Share

Related articles

Call for urgent amicus briefs!

In April 2014 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) declared invalid the Data Retention Directive that unified the rules of the retention of selective data by Internet and telephone services and determined the accessibility of data by authorities in the member states. Despite the content of the judgment, the Hungarian act allowing data retention is still in force. In October, 2014 the HCLU started litigation against two major service providers in order to force the Hungarian Constitutional Court (CC) to repeal the unlawful act.

Why doesn't the Prime Minister speak up?

A human rights crisis has emerged in the Ukraine. One after another, the institutions and Member States of the European Union have spoken up against violence and in the defence of democracy but the leaders of the Hungarian administration keep deep silence. The Hungarian Civil Liberties Union has sent a letter to Viktor Orbán calling him as the responsible head of the Hungarian Government to stand up against the authoritarianism and violence from the part of the state in the neighbouring Ukraine and to offer mediation services to facilitate a peaceful resolution of the crisis as soon as possible.