Nuclear case - still no access to details of the damage reduction process in the Paks Nuclear Plant

The Capital Court of Appeal has made a decision on 20 April about the lawsuit of Energy Club and National Atomic Energy Agency’s Nuclear Safety Directorate (NAEA-NSD) in the second instance court. The judiciary overruled the judgement of the first instance court and ordered to initiate a new proceeding. In the lawsuit HCLU represents the suitor. The appeal does not lie against this decision which is, though favourable, still does not result the access to the demanded data.

The court rejected the explanation of court of first instance according to which the the claim was not specific enough and can be refused by the Aarhus Convention. Quite important that in this decision the claimed enviromental data is considered and emphasised being a public interest data according to the very law on privacy and access to public interest data.

The defendant has to present its evidences in during the encored proceeding since the court of first instance did not evaluated them. According to the very rule the data processing institution has to verify the reasons of denial, the court of second instance does not practice verification. Experts are justified to get involved in such a process in order to allocate the data counting as trade secret.

The court underlined that in a public interest access case the defendant cannot refer to reasons (such as national security interests) that did not even exist when refusing the requested data.

The case continues at the Metropolitan Court of Budapest following the orders of the Capital Court of Appeal.

 

Share

Related articles

Performance on International Freedom of Information Day

On Sepetember 28th, International Freedom of Information Day is celebrated in 40 countries worldwide. This year, it is celebrated in Hungary for the first time, organized by the HCLU during the Week of Civil Awareness.

Half the Battle Won in the “Nuclear” Lawsuit

The Court of Appeals sent the case back to the Metropolitan Court because the court of first instance was wrong in defining the expert opinions regarding the re-start of the Paks Nuclear Power Plant’s 2nd block were not public data. The Court of Appeals ruled that indeed they were public data, but it was possible that they were to be considered as trade secrets or fell under copyright laws. This however needed to be decided by the court of first instance in a re-trial.

Landmark decision on freedom of information by the European Court of Human Rights

The Hungarian Civil Liberties Union won a freedom of information case against the Republic of Hungary. For the first time, the right to access to state-held information as part of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights has been formally recognized, as reflected in today’s ruling by the European Court of Human Rights. The Strasbourg based Court declared that withholding information needed to participate in public debate on matters of public importance may violate the freedom of expression.