Profit-making through FOI?

A draft bill on the re-use of public sector information submitted to the Hungarian Parliament by the government would make the national FOI legislation highly unpredictable - according to the HCLU and K-Monitor, major Hungarian NGOs working for transparency and freedom of information. The proposal intends to harmonize Hungarian freedom of information legislation with the EU law by implementing the 2003/98/EC Directive on the re-use of public sector information. The latter is to be revised soon, due to a proposal of the European Commission. The HCLU and K-Monitor ask legislative authorities to withdraw their draft proposal due to the following reasons.

1. The draft law confuses “public sector information” and “public interest information” thus deteriorating existing freedom of information regulations.

2. Access to information held by public authorities is free, as only necessary reproduction costs shall be charged. Contrarily, the draft bill makes access to public interest information subject to a possible reimbursement based on a “reasonable profit margin”.

3. Whereas the usage of public interest data has no limitations, the government’s proposal stipulates an “agreement on re-use” between the respective public authority and the data requester, thus data re-use may be subject to certain binding conditions.

4. The draft proposal is an infringement of the rule of law: it depends solely on the statement of the data requestor whether limitations on free distribution shall be made alongside with a profit-orientated reimbursement charged by the public authority, or general rules of FOI - free access and unlimited re-use - will be applied. The draft bill primarily endangers the right to access of legally uneducated citizens who are unable to pay lawyers, since they may be driven to make unintentional statements.

5. The draft is meant to serve as harmonization of the respective EC Directive. However, the draft law is out-of-date: the European Commission has already accepted a proposal on the revision of the PSI Directive which “establishes the principle that public bodies should not be allowed to charge more than costs triggered by the individual request for data (marginal costs); in practice this means most data will be offered for free or virtually for free, unless duly justified.” Thus, the Hungarian draft law on public service information is regarded as obsolete even before coming into existence.

6. The proposal violates formal requirements on fundamental right limitations as it gives authorization to regulatory restriction on freedom of information. The bill is formally unconstitutional.

7. Existing Hungarian regulations meet the requirements of the original EC Directive. There’s no specific harmonization urge, with particular reference to the proposed revision of the directive.

Share

Related articles

Draft law on data protection and freedom of information

The draft law – currently before the Parliament – on Data Protection and Freedom of Information will replace the independent Data Protection and Freedom of Information Commissioner with an administrative authority. This change will seriously diminish the level of privacy protection and weaken the right to access to information in Hungary.

Press Release: The Hungarian Privatization and State Holding Company Ordered to Release Secret Privatization Clauses

The journalist of Manager Magazine has won the lawsuit against the Hungarian Privatization and State Holding Company (ÁPV Rt.). The establishment has been ordered to release two privatization contracts from the 90’s along with the secret clauses, within 15 days. By reaching this verdict, the Capital Court of Appeal has confirmed the previous, first instance decision of the court, that the documentation (contracts, memorandums) is to be considered public interest data.

Risky Substances and Dangerous Drug Policies - What is Freedom of Information Good For?

A letter from Health Minister, Dr. Lajos Molnár, has been made public. In it, he asks that the Pschyciatric and Neurological Professional Board revoke its previous opinion and issue a new, quality report.