Risky Substances and Dangerous Drug Policies - What is Freedom of Information Good For?

A letter from Health Minister, Dr. Lajos Molnár, has been made public. In it, he asks that the Pschyciatric and Neurological Professional Board revoke its previous opinion and issue a new, quality report.

The prelude to the letter was the HCLU's much debated published work, "Risky Substances and Dangerous Drug Policies", in which an answer was written to the Psychiatric and Neurological Professional Board's opinion regarding the health hazards of drugs. In order to gain access to the document, almost a year of court proceedings were needed.

Besides gaining access to the public interest report, the HCLU's goal was to provide the decisionmakers with scientific, differentiated and real facts on such serious social matters as the hazards and risks of psychoactive substances.

The HCLU considers it a great success that upon the request of the Psychiatric Professional Board, another deeper and more expert report was prepared by an independent expert.

As far as the HCLU knows, besides requesting a new opinion from the board, the department has initiated widespread discussion in the hopes of coming to a consensus on the health hazards of drugs.

To: Professor István Bitter
President
Psychiatric Professional Board
SE Psychiatric and Psychotherapy Clinic
Balassa st. 6.
Budapest
1083

Dear Mr. President,

I hereby inform you that the report prepared by the Psychiatric and Neurological Professional Board, upon the request of the previous heathcare minister on the health hazards of drugs, is unacceptable. It is my opinion that the standpoint is strongly objectionable professionally and it is unacceptable that it was prepared employing foreign expert reports, which, could even infringe copyright laws. Furthermore, I insist that in the future, professional circles handle this matter with due seriousness and with respect to its place in society.

Due to the above, I insist that the issued report be revoked immediately in writing and be disregarded. I also request the establishment of a new opinion befitting the social importance and holding the moral and professional substance of European norms.

Furthermore, it must be suitable for the establishment of a drug strategy worthy of the healthcare department.

Budapest, January 19th

Sincerely,

Dr. Lajos Molnár
Minister of Healthcare

 

Share

Related articles

Metropolitan Court Returns Decision on HCLU vs. National Police Headquarters (ORFK); The HCLU Plans to Appeal

Today, the HCLU has claimed partial victory in the lawsuit against the ORFK. The court has ordered the ORFK to make public such orders and practices which are of public interest. The HCLU will appeal the decision. Read the premise and the verdict!

There is No Effective Control Over National Security - Three Civil Organizations File Complaints with the Constitutional Court

The Eötvös Károly Institute, the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, and Transparency International Hungary seek to jointly challenge the new Act on the protection of classified information, promulgated on April 1st, and several provisions of the Act on national security before the Constitutional Court.

Supreme Court Decision – Data on Budapest’s CCTV Is to Be Made Public

The important lesson in this case is that even though hundreds of cameras are monitoring our lives day and night, the police still do not have any evidence backing up the effectiveness of the CCTV in crime prevention. At least the Supreme Court, in it’s decision, has given back a piece of our right to personal privacy by making public when and where CCTVs are watching, thus we will be less at the mercy of those watching us. On the basis of public interest data, it will be easier to judge the price we have to pay for the promise of public safety.