Supreme Court Decision – Data on Budapest’s CCTV Is to Be Made Public

The important lesson in this case is that even though hundreds of cameras are monitoring our lives day and night, the police still do not have any evidence backing up the effectiveness of the CCTV in crime prevention. At least the Supreme Court, in it’s decision, has given back a piece of our right to personal privacy by making public when and where CCTVs are watching, thus we will be less at the mercy of those watching us. On the basis of public interest data, it will be easier to judge the price we have to pay for the promise of public safety.

On March 28th, 2007 the Supreme Court in an exraordinary remedy proceeding ruled in favor of the right to freedom of information and self determination. The HCLU filed suit against the Budapest Police Headquarters, since they have denied access to data about CCTV. The HCLU have enquired from the police about the placing, operating, effectiveness and economic aspects of the CCTV, but were denied access to maps on location of the cameras and were also denied access to the contracts between the district police headquarters and local governments relating to the operation of the CCTV.

In 2006 HCLU has already won the lawsuit, but the Budapest Police Headquarters had appealed for a special legal redress. The Supreme Court after re-examining the decision stated that the police has the obligation to notify the public with regard to where exactly cameras are operating and cannot deny this information citing crime prevention intrests. The court has also ruled that the police contracts regarding the CCTV also have to be made public.

The Supreme Court has changed it’s previous final decision on a few points. Accordingly, the police do not have to issue new statistics and studies on the impact, since in the course of the proceeding it came to light, that besides those few statistics, until 2004 no other statistics and studies of impact have been made on the CCTV. Moreover, the police also do not have the obligation to make public their development conceptions.

 

Share

Related articles

Double success: freedom of information and HCLU won!

The Metropolitan Appellate Court (Fővárosi Ítélőtábla) delivered its final judgment on appeal in the case against the Hungarian Official Gazette on March 2, 2006. The appellate court changed the verdict of the court of the first instance in favor of the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU).

Hungary's Weak New Anti-Corruption Program

The Hungarian government has devised a new anti-corruption program, which, as opposed to reducing corruption, in fact increases the government's power. Compared with earlier plans, reforms concerning the financing of parties and the protection of whistleblowers have been excluded from the program, which also fails to deal with the asset declarations of MPs. The civil and the business sectors, in turn, are facing stricter regulations in the future.

Hungary Classifies All Information Regarding Paks Nuclear Plant

Five NGOs, including the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, have addressed an open letter to Hungary's president after the draft law on the maintenance of the Paks Nuclear Power Plant was passed by the Parliament. The NGOs demand that President János Áder initiate a constitutional review of the law before the Constitutional Court. The NGOs are concerned because the new act severely limits access to public interest data by rendering all information concerning the Paks plant as classified data for the next 30 years. Opposition parties have joined the organizations in attacking the decision.