The Statement of HCLU Regarding the New Amendment Proposals Presented in Relation to the Media Law

HCLU continues to maintain its position that the Bill regarding the fundamental rules of press freedom and media content is conceptually misguided, and therefore we ask for its removal from the Competent.

You may read our position here (in Hungarian).

According to HCLU, the regulations must be formed and coordinated with industry stakeholders, journalists, professional organizations; they must be conceptually new, appropriate within European Union directives and to the situation of today's media market as well, in which the freedom of press must be the governing principle. Hungarian media diversity and the significant reduction of frequency-scarcity should have resulted in the legislature breaking down the current strict rules, and intervening with the operation of the media market when and where it is clearly justified, as in case of the public media.

The HCLU has repeatedly engaged with regulatory proposals concerning the media and our positions may be viewed here (in Hungarian):

http://tasz.hu/files/tasz/imce/mediatartalom_tasz.pdf

http://tasz.hu/files/tasz/imce/sajtoszabadsag_mediatartalom_tasz.pdf

Overall, the submitted amendments to the proposal do not solve the problems that stem from the clauses restricting freedom of speech in the conceptually misguided Bill, or in even more cases, clauses that further restrict the freedom of the press. The new amendments make source protection  and investigative journalism impossible, while the mandatory content requirements, compulsory pre-registration, and standards regarding the vague “public morality”,  jeopardize  the editorial freedom and through this, the operation of the independent press.

Share

Related articles

HCLU protests against the proposed new media legislation

The new media-press regulation plan is unfounded, and fails to meet established European freedom of press standards. Moreover, the so-called “media package” sponsored by two right-wing MPs from the governing party (Antal Rogán, András Cser-Palkovics), contains bills with several unconstitutional clauses. The bills would bring about significant changes to the functioning of printed press, television, radio and part of the internet as well. The HCLU disapproves of the process by which the new parliamentary majority has gone about building a completely new regulation plan without any previous consultation, open debate with stakeholders, experts or journalists.  This is foolhardy at best, since the bills represent an attempt at a far-reaching overhaul in media regulation.

Executive Board of the Labour Party Acquitted

Upon the initiation of the President of Capitol Court, criminal proceedings were started against the Executive Board of the Labour Party for defamation. According to the accusation and later the arraignment, 7 members of the Board have committed the act of defamation. The Party – in a statement - deemed a verdict of the Capitol Court a ’political decision’ and ’revenge of power’.

The Third Wave – the New Constitution of Hungary

In their current, third analysis on the legislative work of the Hungarian Parliament,  the Eötvös Károly Policy Institute, the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) and the Hungarian Helsinki Committee (HHC) examine whether the constitution-making process in Hungary meets the requirements deriving from the principle of the rule of law and compares the draft “Fundamental Law” (i.e. the draft of the new Constitution) submitted to the Parliament on 14 March 2011 with the present constitutional system.