The Statement of HCLU Regarding the New Amendment Proposals Presented in Relation to the Media Law

HCLU continues to maintain its position that the Bill regarding the fundamental rules of press freedom and media content is conceptually misguided, and therefore we ask for its removal from the Competent.

You may read our position here (in Hungarian).

According to HCLU, the regulations must be formed and coordinated with industry stakeholders, journalists, professional organizations; they must be conceptually new, appropriate within European Union directives and to the situation of today's media market as well, in which the freedom of press must be the governing principle. Hungarian media diversity and the significant reduction of frequency-scarcity should have resulted in the legislature breaking down the current strict rules, and intervening with the operation of the media market when and where it is clearly justified, as in case of the public media.

The HCLU has repeatedly engaged with regulatory proposals concerning the media and our positions may be viewed here (in Hungarian):

http://tasz.hu/files/tasz/imce/mediatartalom_tasz.pdf

http://tasz.hu/files/tasz/imce/sajtoszabadsag_mediatartalom_tasz.pdf

Overall, the submitted amendments to the proposal do not solve the problems that stem from the clauses restricting freedom of speech in the conceptually misguided Bill, or in even more cases, clauses that further restrict the freedom of the press. The new amendments make source protection  and investigative journalism impossible, while the mandatory content requirements, compulsory pre-registration, and standards regarding the vague “public morality”,  jeopardize  the editorial freedom and through this, the operation of the independent press.

Share

Related articles

Five NGOs’ Joint Letter to the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe

The Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, Transparency International Hungary, K-Monitor, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee and the Eötvös Károly Institute turned to the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe to obtain its position regarding the amendment of the Constitution which would rectrict the Constitutional Court’s power.

Capital Court of Appeals Verdict: the protection of public authority institution’s reputation cannot restrict the freedom of pol

Today, the Capital Court of Appeals has reached its verdict in the 2nd degree proceedings of the Ministry of Justice and Law Enforcement vs. Viktor Orbán. Read on for the details!

Freedom of speech triumphs over Auchan Hungary Ltd.

The Budapest Court of Appeal has reversed the verdict of first instance on 14 Sept, 2006, in the case of Auchan Hungary Limited versus The Clean Air Action Group. According to the decision, András Lukács, President of The Clean Air Action Group was not guilty of defamation as originally charged. András Lukács was represented by Environmental Management and Law Association (EMLA) and HCLU.