Court of the first instance denied our petition against the Budapest Police Department

The Central District Court of Pest denied the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union's (HCLU) petition against Budapest Police Department (Budapesti Rendőr Főkapitányság) for the disclosure of the data of public interest regarding the camera systems installed in several districts of Budapest.

We submitted a questionnaire to the local police departments in the spring of 2004. The questionnaire contained 80 questions enquiring about the conditions and circumstances of operating the camera systems. The Budapest Police Department responded to our questions.

Unfortunately many of our questions had been unanswered. According to the police, if they gave answers to all of our questions they would jeopardize crime investigation purposes. In HCLU’s view all the questions of the questionnaire were aimed at and related to data of public interest. Therefore, we filed an action against the Budapest Police Department at the court for disclosure of data of public interest.

It took one year for the court to schedule the first hearing and than the court of first instance denied our petition.

The curiosity of the case is that previously we have asked the same questions regarding the same issue from local governments in Budapest and also on the countryside. Against many of them we filed petitions as well for the disclosure of data of public interest. We settled with the local government of Terézváros before the first hearing. The local government disclosed the required data and HCLU withdrew the petition. We won the lawsuit against the city of Székesfehérvár and the city disclosed the data as well. HCLU won the lawsuit against Újpest as well, however the local government of Újpest has not provided us with the required data yet.

 

Share

Related articles

Government sessions still not public – HCLU’s opinion

A new draft law titled ‘governmental structure changes related law modifications’ was presented by the Government on 3 Nov, 2006.

Why was the search of the whistleblower’s home unlawful?

In November, 2013 András Horváth, former staff member of the Hungarian National Tax and Customs Administration turned to the public with his information on companies committing VAT fraud with the assistance of the National Tax and Customs Administration (NAV). The whistleblower decided to seek publicity after several unsuccessful attempts to raise the issue within the Administration and the government. The revelations resulted in huge media coverage and created an unresolved political scandal ever since.

Information Freedom wins in Gripen-case

Following today’s first instance decision of the Capital Court, the Ministry of Economy and Transport is ordered to make public their list of fulfilments approved until 11.09.2008 by the Offset Committee with regard to the Gripen fighter-jets. The Court emphasized, that since public funds - which are of public interest - are involved, the fact that contracting partners are citing business secrets is, by itsself not enough to withhold the information from the public.