Final judgement of Capital Court in favor of Freedom of Information

The HCLU was contacted by a representative of Zöld Rádió Kht. (Green Radio) after failing to gain access to data on ad hoc winning tenders from the Radio and Television Commission. Previously, the Court in its first instance decison has ordered the Broadcasting Fund to issue the requested documentation, but since the defendant was not present at the reading of the verdict, the ruling did not come into effect.

The lawsuit was initiated against the Radio and Television Commission, but on the first day of hearings had to be changed to the Broadcasting Fund. According to the Act on Data Protection, the lawsuit has to be initiated against whoever denies access to the requested data. In this case, the Broadcasting Fund.

The Broadcasting Fund defense was build on the opinion, that since the 1996. Act I. 77.§ (1) paragraph on the tasks of the Broadcasting Fund does not mention that the Fund is a public service body, therefore the Fund does not fall into the Act on Data Protection’s jurisdiction.

In contrast to this, the HCLU’s opinion is that even though the Act does not specify the tasks to be of public interest, it does not eliminate it either. The task of the Fund is public service broadcasting and part of the funding of these public programs is from the state budget, therefore the activity of the Fund is undisputedly public service.

Considering, that according to the Act on Data Protection, any data handled by a public service body qualifies as public interest data, the HCLU’s opinion is that data handled by the Broadcasting Fund is also of public interest. Thus, denial of access to the requested data also falls under the jurisdiction of the strict orders of the Act on Data Protection.

 

Share

Related articles

Profit-making through FOI?

A draft bill on the re-use of public sector information submitted to the Hungarian Parliament by the government would make the national FOI legislation highly unpredictable - according to the HCLU and K-Monitor, major Hungarian NGOs working for transparency and freedom of information. The proposal intends to harmonize Hungarian freedom of information legislation with the EU law by implementing the 2003/98/EC Directive on the re-use of public sector information. The latter is to be revised soon, due to a proposal of the European Commission. The HCLU and K-Monitor ask legislative authorities to withdraw their draft proposal due to the following reasons.

Hungarian NGOs turn to Barroso over planned removal of Hungarian data protection commissioner

Eötvös Károly Policy Institute, Hungarian Civil Liberties Union and Hungarian Helsinki Committee informed the President of the European Commission on the failure of the Hungarian lawmaker to fulfill its obligation to guarantee the complete independence of the Data Protection Commissioner. Hungary therefore breached its duty arising from EU law.

Whistleblower Protection in Central and Eastern Europe

K-Monitor Association and the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union organized a project on Legal Regulation of Public Interest Disclosures in Post-Soviet Democracies. The two Hungarian NGOs created a virtual conference on whistleblowing protection with an interactive discussion surface in English as well as an online content in form of this website. For the implementation of the “virtual conference”, K-Monitor and HCLU also invited NGOs working in the field of anti-corruption from Bosnia, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia, Poland, Moldova and Hungary to take part in the project.