Freedom of Information Celebration

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights has declared that everyone has the right to access to states’ public interest data. This is the first precedent when an international court admits such a wide range of human rights.

The story began on 6 May 1998, three environmental activists, including one member of the Chilean parliament, filed an access to information request with the Chilean government for copies of the background and environmental checks on US-based company Trillium Corporation which had started a major logging project in the native lenga forest of the Chilean part of Tierra del Fuego, in the Rio Condor valley. The Chilean courts had dismissed the case, so the environmental activists turned to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

Legal background

The 13. Article of the American Convention of Human Rights similarly to the 10. Article of the European Convention of Human Rights regulates the Access to Information as being a part of the Freedom of Expression.

The decree of the Court

According to the court’s decree Freedom of Information:

- guarantees the right of accessing to public interest data to everyone;

- obliges the government to publish requested information or justify its reasons in case of refusing to publish data;

- the one who request the data does not have to clarify the motivation of the request;

- can only be limited according to the Convention (in case of protecting others’ rights, national security, public security, public health and public moral) and only when it is considered to be commensurable measure and only restricts the Freedom of Information to a necessary extent (the state itself has to prove it).

The Court has also declared that states also have to abolish their rules restricting Freedom of Information and they also have to adopt rules related to it. These rules have to dispose of restricting the Freedom of Information. These restrictions have to be in accordance with the Convention.

Considering all these above, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights published its unanimous decision on 11 Oct 2006 in which Chile was seriously criticized for breaching the 13. Article of the Convention and also was obliged to publish the requested data or either justify the denial. And the Court has also ordered Chile to eliminate an adequate regulation system on access to information and teach public officers in relation with it.

Share

Related articles

Whistleblower Protection in Central and Eastern Europe

K-Monitor Association and the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union organized a project on Legal Regulation of Public Interest Disclosures in Post-Soviet Democracies. The two Hungarian NGOs created a virtual conference on whistleblowing protection with an interactive discussion surface in English as well as an online content in form of this website. For the implementation of the “virtual conference”, K-Monitor and HCLU also invited NGOs working in the field of anti-corruption from Bosnia, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia, Poland, Moldova and Hungary to take part in the project.

The HCLU Wins 100 Billion Lawsuit

In September, 2006 the HCLU has sued the Ministry of Finance for denying to make public the information relating to the 100 billion forint deficit in the 2006 budget. Last October the Metropolitan Court has ruled in favor of the HCLU and in it's first instance decision has declared the requested data to be of public-interest.

Profit-making through FOI?

A draft bill on the re-use of public sector information submitted to the Hungarian Parliament by the government would make the national FOI legislation highly unpredictable - according to the HCLU and K-Monitor, major Hungarian NGOs working for transparency and freedom of information. The proposal intends to harmonize Hungarian freedom of information legislation with the EU law by implementing the 2003/98/EC Directive on the re-use of public sector information. The latter is to be revised soon, due to a proposal of the European Commission. The HCLU and K-Monitor ask legislative authorities to withdraw their draft proposal due to the following reasons.