State of danger is followed by Transitional Act - Joint analysis of the provisions

We cannot bid farewell to the notion of the Government ruling by decree even now, after the ordinary operation of the legal order have been restored.

Special legal order was terminated in Hungary as of 18 June 2020, and so, formally, the Government’s extraordinary powers were withdrawn as well. With the termination of the state of danger, the much-criticized1 Authorization Act2 was repealed, along with the close to 150 government decrees that were adopted under the state of danger. However, we cannot bid farewell to the notion of the Government ruling by decree even now, after the ordinary operation of the legal order have been restored, since the Government has preserved important elements of its extraordinary powers also for the ordinary legal order, with a reference to the state of “epidemiological preparedness”. Furthermore, even though the government decrees that were issued under the state of danger, partly using the powers granted by the Authorization Act, were repealed as well, the Government ensured that many of the provisions originally included in these decrees continue to apply. Thus, the nature of exercising political power, namely using, abusing and amending legal rules and various legal institutions with the aim of constantly widening the powers of the executive branch, will not change in the upcoming months, but will simply be exercised within a new legal framework, with reference to the “epidemiological preparedness”. This continuity is ensured by the Transitional Act, 3 adopted by the Parliament on 16 June.

The joint analysis by Amnesty International Hungary, the Eötvös Károly Institute, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee and the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union is available below:

Detailed analysis of the Transitional Act’s provisions on special legal order and the state of medical crisis, and on other provisions concerning fundamental rights and the rule of law

donwload »

Share

Related articles

INCLO welcomes EU court ruling on Hungary's anti-NGO law

INCLO welcomes EU court ruling, calling on governments to revoke hostile NGO legislation and refrain from adopting such laws.

Advocate General of the CJEU: Hungarian law that restricts NGO financing from abroad is incompatible with EU law

According to the Court of Justice Advocate General’s opinion, the fact that under the Hungarian 2017 Lex NGO, civil society organisations receiving foreign donations are subject to restrictions violates the right to the protection of private life and the right to freedom of association, and infringes the principle of free movement of capital. This is not justified by the general interest objectives relied on by the government of Hungary. Based on the AG opinion published today, the Court of Justice of the European Union is likely to decide that the Lex NGO is in breach of the EU law.

Public hearing is next step in the fight against the stigmatization of Hungarian civil society actors

The action against the act stigmatizing Hungarian civil society organizations has entered a new phase: on 22 October the Court of Justice of the European Union will conduct a public hearing on the case.