State of danger is followed by Transitional Act - Joint analysis of the provisions

We cannot bid farewell to the notion of the Government ruling by decree even now, after the ordinary operation of the legal order have been restored.

Special legal order was terminated in Hungary as of 18 June 2020, and so, formally, the Government’s extraordinary powers were withdrawn as well. With the termination of the state of danger, the much-criticized1 Authorization Act2 was repealed, along with the close to 150 government decrees that were adopted under the state of danger. However, we cannot bid farewell to the notion of the Government ruling by decree even now, after the ordinary operation of the legal order have been restored, since the Government has preserved important elements of its extraordinary powers also for the ordinary legal order, with a reference to the state of “epidemiological preparedness”. Furthermore, even though the government decrees that were issued under the state of danger, partly using the powers granted by the Authorization Act, were repealed as well, the Government ensured that many of the provisions originally included in these decrees continue to apply. Thus, the nature of exercising political power, namely using, abusing and amending legal rules and various legal institutions with the aim of constantly widening the powers of the executive branch, will not change in the upcoming months, but will simply be exercised within a new legal framework, with reference to the “epidemiological preparedness”. This continuity is ensured by the Transitional Act, 3 adopted by the Parliament on 16 June.

The joint analysis by Amnesty International Hungary, the Eötvös Károly Institute, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee and the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union is available below:

Detailed analysis of the Transitional Act’s provisions on special legal order and the state of medical crisis, and on other provisions concerning fundamental rights and the rule of law

donwload »

Share

Related articles

Surveilled but not consulted: Citizens living under constant technological surveillance

Increasingly, and almost always without social debate, facial recognition systems are being used by states to monitor and track their citizens. Inadequate regulation violates fundamental rights, while technological inaccuracies reinforce discrimination. On Data Protection Day, the International Network of Civil Liberties Organizations (INCLO) published its report summarising international experiences, in cooperation with the HCLU - as the problem also affects Hungary.

Early removal of Hungarian Supreme Court president violates Convention

Today the European Court of Human Rights concluded Hungary was in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights due to the premature termination of the Hungarian Supreme Court’s President’s mandate in early 2012. The judgment confirms concerns of the HHC, the HCLU and the Eötvös Károly Institute that Mr Baka’s dismissal violated the independence of the judiciary, and was a further step in weakening the rule of law in Hungary.

Never-ending story?

Rapid analysis of the Bills T/10747 and T/10748.