Research on the obstruction of the work of journalists during the coronavirus pandemic in Hungary

In April 2020, the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) published a research report examining the relationship between independent media and public authorities during the coronavirus pandemic in Hungary.

Representatives of 19 media organisations were interviewed that regularly deal with, report on, analyse or comment on public affairs, and they carry out all these activities with financial and editorial independence from public authorities. Based on the interviews, HCLU came to the following findings:

  • Public information on the coronavirus pandemic has been centralized and restricted. Restrictions are most detrimental to independent media that provide daily news.
  • Other sources of information have also been narrowed. Potential information providers are intimidated. Retaliation threatens those who leak information to the independent press.
  • The amendment of the legal provisions of scaremongering as a criminal offence affects the majority of journalists.
  • Discrediting independent media has been intensified and become organized. There is a regular smear campaign carried out in the public service media against critical voices, in particular against the independent media outlets, which immediately sweeps through the propaganda media machine.

Background:

The present interviews with journalists were conducted for two reasons. First, in 2019-2020 HCLU carried out a much larger comprehensive research examining the relationship between independent media and public authorities in Hungary through in-depth interviews with journalists and specific examples, as well as legal cases in its own practice. The research revealed systemic obstruction of the work of the independent media in the form of ignoring press inquiries, open rejection, physical distancing of journalists, discreditation, stigmatization, and finally intimidation of their sources. Last but not least, the research pointed to an element of media freedom and its restrictions that have not received enough attention so far.

Second, the Hungarian Parliament adopted the Coronavirus Act in March 2020, which gave the government unprecedented power. The new law also introduced a vaguely worded new paragraph to the already existing offence of scaremongering in the Criminal Code, which threatens the critical and independent media outlets in Hungary. The results of the present research showed that these fears are well-founded.

Research on the obstruction of the work of journalists during the coronavirus pandemic in Hungary

donwload »

Research on barriers to Hungarian journalism

donwload »

Share

Related articles

Hungarian Church Law Is Deemed Unconstitutional

The latest decision of the Constitutional Court (CC) was established partly due to the constitutional complaints submitted by the HCLU. The decision states that the main provisions of the Church Law, which came into effect last year, are in serious violation of fundamental rights and the principles of the rule of law. This decision, however, is not expected to remedy the harm suffered by the denominations concerned, because the Fundamental Law of Hungary is proposed to amend with the annulled provisions by the Parliament.

Again, the Banning of the Budapest Pride March Requires Legal Remedy

With the legal help of the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, the Rainbow Mission Foundation challenges the banning order issued by the Budapest Chief of Police.

HCLU Wins Freedom of Speech Case at European Court of Human Rights

On July 19th, after a lengthy legal battle, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg ruled in favor of journalist Peter Uj, represented by the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union. The journalist criticized the state owned Tokaj Kereskedőház (Hungarian winery) and specifically characterized it’s wine as shit. Criminal charges (defamation and criminal libel) initiated by the Tokaj Kereskedőház were pressed against him.