Research on the obstruction of the work of journalists during the coronavirus pandemic in Hungary

In April 2020, the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) published a research report examining the relationship between independent media and public authorities during the coronavirus pandemic in Hungary.

Representatives of 19 media organisations were interviewed that regularly deal with, report on, analyse or comment on public affairs, and they carry out all these activities with financial and editorial independence from public authorities. Based on the interviews, HCLU came to the following findings:

  • Public information on the coronavirus pandemic has been centralized and restricted. Restrictions are most detrimental to independent media that provide daily news.
  • Other sources of information have also been narrowed. Potential information providers are intimidated. Retaliation threatens those who leak information to the independent press.
  • The amendment of the legal provisions of scaremongering as a criminal offence affects the majority of journalists.
  • Discrediting independent media has been intensified and become organized. There is a regular smear campaign carried out in the public service media against critical voices, in particular against the independent media outlets, which immediately sweeps through the propaganda media machine.

Background:

The present interviews with journalists were conducted for two reasons. First, in 2019-2020 HCLU carried out a much larger comprehensive research examining the relationship between independent media and public authorities in Hungary through in-depth interviews with journalists and specific examples, as well as legal cases in its own practice. The research revealed systemic obstruction of the work of the independent media in the form of ignoring press inquiries, open rejection, physical distancing of journalists, discreditation, stigmatization, and finally intimidation of their sources. Last but not least, the research pointed to an element of media freedom and its restrictions that have not received enough attention so far.

Second, the Hungarian Parliament adopted the Coronavirus Act in March 2020, which gave the government unprecedented power. The new law also introduced a vaguely worded new paragraph to the already existing offence of scaremongering in the Criminal Code, which threatens the critical and independent media outlets in Hungary. The results of the present research showed that these fears are well-founded.

Research on the obstruction of the work of journalists during the coronavirus pandemic in Hungary

donwload »

Research on barriers to Hungarian journalism

donwload »

Share

Related articles

Make the registering procedure for Orbán’s press conferences public!

The government is working hard to obscure the events and to confuse the public opinion following the banning of several editorial offices - including the staff of 24.hu, one of the most read online portals - from Orbán’s annual “Orbáninfo” last Thursday. While the fact alone that the Prime Minister is willing to expose himself -once a year - to journalists independent from the government is a rarity, it is decided entirely arbitrarily who may be given this opportunity and who will be denied entry.

Read more »

What Is The Problem With The Hungarian Law On Foreign Funded NGOs?

On 13 June 2017, the Hungarian National Assembly (Parliament) adopted the Act LXXVI of 2017 on the Transparency of Organisations Supported from Abroad (hereinafter: the Law). It obliges associations and foundations that receives at least 7.2 million HUF annually from foreign source to register with the court as an organization receiving foreign funding, to annually report about their foreign funding, and to indicate the label “organization receiving foreign funding” on their website and publications. The list of foreign funded NGOs is also published on a government website.

Read more »

Government decides on totalitarian refugee laws

With the use of the military inside the country and the reclassification of illegal border crossing from an offence to a crime, the government would put in force totalitarian practices before the change of the regime. Therefore, TASZ calls upon the parliamentarians to reject a law which ignores the basic requirements of constitutionality in light of the human rights crisis produced by the high number of refugees.

Read more »