Thank you for supporting us!

HCLU has received an amount of 1 315 925 HUF from the 1% of taxpayers paid income tax - according to the Act CXXVI of 1996 On the Use of a Specified Amount of Personal Income Tax in Accordance with the Taxpayer's Instruction that allows taxpayers to allocate a certain percentage of their previous year's paid income tax to beneficiaries entitled to receive such funds.

The amounts coming from taxpayers 1% of their paid income tax is getting higher in the past couple of years. In 2004, after the campaign for the 1%, HCLU received an amount of 1 194 234 HUF.

As usually, this amount is spent on the salaries of lawyers working for HCLU's Legal Aid Service.

HCLU wants to thank for the support!

Please support us with your 1% of your paid income tax in 2007 as well!

Share

Related articles

Did the police become a tool in the election campaign?

While the police descended on András Pikó's 8th District campaign team because of a photo that showed nothing more than activists leaning over papers, the clearly legible photos made of the “Kubatov List” did not merit an investigation. On Election Day, opposition activists chased groups of people presumably involved in the organized transport of electors and even found a packet that looked like a bunch of ballot papers in a taxi, but the police had not acted. Why did they react to these situations differently?

HCLU’s Boycott: The Unlawful NGO Act is Bound to Fail

The Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (HCLU) denounces the unlawful NGO Act, even in its final version. According to the watchdog organization, the bill should not have been adopted at all, as it violates fundamental rights. The organization believes that the most effective way of acting against the unlawful provisions is not to abide the law the. They underline that, given their economic management is already fully transparent, this would not violate anyone’s rights or the demand of transparency.

Thought You Couldn't Be Brought to Court for Smoking a Joint in Hungary?

If you thought the simple consumption of a joint couldn't land you in front of a judge, you were wrong. Domonkos's story is a case in point.