The Agreement Between the Hungarian Tax and Financial Control Administration (APEH) and Business Software Alliance (BSA) Has to

On Friday the HCLU have called upon the APEH to make public the cooperation agreement with BSA on the grounds of public interest data. The document was made accessible on the internet, even though previously the APEH stated that ’by unwritten law, such documents contain an obligation of secrecy, thus the original text will not be made public on the APEH’s webpage’.

The document contains just a few specifics and it is difficult to deduct from those such conclusions as the ones that aroused concern after the press conference. Still, several critical points remain. Below, we will discuss a few of these.

In the fourth point of the preliminary regulation, among other things, both parties declared their will to stand up against unlawful software use. The Act XCII of 2003 on the order of taxation does not mention that the APEH has any role in the field of illegal software use.

According to the act, the APEH handles all tax, budget support, tax return requests, tax returns, state guarantee allocations and claims and in cases of levying public dues, provided it was not assigned by law to another authority. However, we were unable to find any implications that the APEH should handle such tasks as criminal investigations that are in the competence of the police.

The only point of connection is Act XIX of 1998 on criminal proceedings

’(1) Everyone has the right to report a crime. Reporting crimes is obligatory, the failure to do so is a crime.

(2) A member of the authority and authorized personnel, as well as the public body, where the law states, also have the obligation to report a crime. naming the perpetrator, if known.

Thus, APEH has an obligation to report solely if the crime is uncovered in their jurisdiction, and can only take action regarding illegal software use if, during their examination of taxation they uncover facts that are criminally suspicious.

Share

Related articles

The HCLU Wins 100 Billion Lawsuit

In September, 2006 the HCLU has sued the Ministry of Finance for denying to make public the information relating to the 100 billion forint deficit in the 2006 budget. Last October the Metropolitan Court has ruled in favor of the HCLU and in it's first instance decision has declared the requested data to be of public-interest.

Report on a FOI lawsuit against the Atomic Energy Authority

The HCLU together with seven other environmental and legal defence NGOs sued the Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority (HAEA) as it has refused to present data of public interest. The first court hearing was on 25th February 2005.

The state, too, can access my phone records?

In its judgement, the Court of Justice of the European Union has declared the Data Retention Directive invalid. Based on the Directive, service providers were keeping phone records and other personal data for 6 months. We have decided to undertake the lengthy process of actually eliminating this European law in Hungary.