The police have put off illegally the demonstration against the visit of the president of Poland

HCLU was disappointing to learn that the police have put off the demonstration of the Amnesty International without prohibitive order and legitimate base. The demonstration was announced in time – as the law of assembly requires.

From the beginning of 2003 the police violated boorishly many times the right of freedom of assembly, even during the electional campaign. This very case also confirms this.

HCLU does not contest that the police have the right to bar places on the base of police law for the good of protected persons. Although in May 2004, in front of the prime minister’s (who is a protected person) house the aggrieved persons of Baumag company were organising a demonstration. This demonstration was banned by the police referring to a law that had been already overruled and not referring to the good of the protected person. The police has seriously misused this rule.

HCLU does call the attention of the Metropolitan Police that the rule they refer to, the so-called ’safety zone for operational area’, does not exist within the Hungarian legal system, furthermore no circumstance can change the status of a public space. Interpreting the rule in this way lacks any legal ground.

Is is quite depressing the Ministry of Interiors, being in charge for the police, cannot guarantee fundamental political liberties, always referring, often rather picking up, interior political real or imaginary reasons to ban demonstrations.

 

Share

Related articles

Social Protest and Human Rights - Discussion

The International Network of Civil Liberties Organizations (INCLO) invites you to a discussion on police use of force and human rights' protections in social protests. The UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions, Christof Heyns, and the UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association, Maina Kiai, are addressing these issues in their annual reports and will explain the challenges we are facing.
Read more »

Litigation on the right to protest

Two actions were launched by the HCLU regarding the right to peaceful assembly in December, 2013. Both actions concern to the same problem: lockdown of a public area around the Prime Minister's residence. In the first case, the police dispersed an ongoing peaceful demonstration on the grounds of closing off the area, for which the organizer filed a claim against the police with the help of HCLU. In the other case, another demonstration planned by the same organizer at the same venue was banned by the court, which was then challenged before the Constitutional Court. Both decisions are ill-unfounded and misinterpret the constitutional limitations of the right to protest.

Read more »

Civil Liberties Groups from 10 Countries Launch Coalition to Reshape Human Rights Landscape

In response to increasing restrictions on personal freedoms and civil protest, independent national human rights organisations from ten countries today launched the International Network of Civil Liberties Organisations (INCLO). They also released “Take Back the Streets: Repression and Criminalisation of Protest Around the World,” a collection of nine case studies showing patterns of police crackdown and abuse against peaceful assembly, accompanied by concrete recommendations to expand free speech.

Read more »