They threaten and that‘s all

The police dissolved the prosecution related to the Internet Jewish DataBase service ran by Matula Magazin. The investigation of the Jewish database based on pure guessing started three months ago against one of the editors of the journal, accusing him with misuse of specific personal information.

Defense in the process was provided by Dr. Andrea Pelle, leader of HCLU’s Legal Advocacy Service. The abandon of the procedure by the prosecutor, resulted of the lack of elements to fulfill the charge of misuse of personal information and of the fact that the committed act was not criminal, is another example of the ‚they threaten, they threaten and nothing happens‘-type actions.

The infamous Sickratman song ‚Turn to the left‘ evoked similar reactions by the lawyers last spring. The prosecution was then also started against Sickratman, and dissolved after one month, this time being enough for the police to state the lack of deliquency.

This time we received the resolution to close it down on 14 June, three months after the investigation started. One may decide if the computers of the Matula Magazin’s editor were fine in the police storage, and if the taxpayers‘ 180,000 forints were spent efficiently in the process launched after the denunciation made by the 'Jobbik Movement for Hungary'.

We cannot resist to note, instead of further comments, the final lines of the HCLU announcement published in March: ‚According to the HCLU’s standpoint, the threatening of the freedom of speech and expression is inacceptable when it is clear from the very beginning that the procedures ran by taxpayers‘ money will end with the clear dissolution of the investigation.‘

 

Share

Related articles

Journalist Wins Defamation Lawsuit

Lajos Gubcsi, former Director of Zrínyi Media Ltd. – a background institution of the Ministry of National Defense – initiated a defamation lawsuit against József Spirk, journalist of Index.hu, the leading online news provider in Hungary. The HCLU’s Legal Aid Service provided legal representation. The court ruled that facts written in the article were well-founded and as a result ruled in favor of the journalist. The ruling is final.

Five NGOs’ Joint Letter to the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe

The Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, Transparency International Hungary, K-Monitor, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee and the Eötvös Károly Institute turned to the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe to obtain its position regarding the amendment of the Constitution which would rectrict the Constitutional Court’s power.

The Statement of HCLU Regarding the New Amendment Proposals Presented in Relation to the Media Law

HCLU continues to maintain its position that the Bill regarding the fundamental rules of press freedom and media content is conceptually misguided, and therefore we ask for its removal from the Competent.

You may read our position here (in Hungarian).