UN experts urge end to restrictions on persons with disabilities

Hungary’s laws, policies and practices which often result in persons with disabilities being placed under guardianship, and in many cases being institutionalised, are grave and systematic violations of their rights, UN experts have found after an extensive inquiry.

Press release of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

These are among the findings and recommendations published today by The UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. A delegation from the Committee visited Hungary in January 2019 and interviewed more than 200 individuals, including persons with disabilities living in small and large institutions, organizations of persons with disabilities, as well as judges, and lawyers, members of the parliament, NGO representatives, academics, and human rights defenders.

“At the time of our visit, some 55,000 persons with disabilities in Hungary were under guardianship, having their rights restricted and with no choice or control over their lives,” said Jonas Ruskus, Vice-Chair of the Committee.

The Committee noted that Hungary had taken measures to transfer persons with disabilities from larger to smaller institutions. The existing national strategy, however, has yet to dismantle institutional settings and address their extremely harmful and discriminatory effects on children with disabilities’ integrity, family life and wellbeing, the report finds. “Nearly 25,000 people with disabilities, including children age under 12, lived in institutions where they continued to face isolation from community life when we visited,” Ruskus added.

The Committee found that despite Hungary’s steps to expand social protection measures and allowances, people continue to rely on institutions to look after their family members. “We are told that it is really hard for children with disabilities and their families to get support in the community, so they are often placed in institutions, which can be extremely difficult,” said Committee member Robert Martin who was part of the delegation.

The Committee also expressed concern about prevailing stereotypes of persons with disabilities, which result in inequality and discrimination. At the time of the inquiry, about 90 per cent of persons with disabilities under guardianship were denied their right to vote and to stand for election.

There is also a persistent paternalistic approach towards persons with disabilities among the judiciary and the legal profession, which interprets the Civil Code restrictions on legal capacity, and the right to vote of persons with disabilities as a “measure of protection”. “This discriminates against persons with intellectual or psychosocial disabilities and also impedes the transformation from an out-dated medical approach to the human rights model of disability,” said Ruskus.

The Committee found violations of the rights of persons with disabilities to equal recognition before the law, to live independently and be included in the community, and to equality and non-discrimination in line with the State party’s obligation under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Hungary ratified the Convention in 2007.

The Committee’s recommendations include abolishing guardianship regimes, ending institutionalisation on the basis of disability, providing reparations for persons with disabilities seeking redress for being institutionalised, and redirecting financial resources, including from the European Structural and Investment Funds to support independent living and inclusion in the community.

“If the Committee’s recommendations are put in place, it will make a difference to the lives of many children and adults with disabilities and their families in Hungary,” said Martin.

The full report and the observations of Hungary can be found here.

Share

Related articles

On the Transparency of Civil Society Organisations

It has been alleged multiple times in recent years that civil society organisations operate in a non-transparent fashion, and do not reveal the sources of their funding. It therefore makes sense to clear up any confusion: this document outlines the current regulations regarding transparency and reporting requirements for civil society organisations. If the goal is actually to increase transparency, this paper will also explain how this can be achieved without increasing reporting tasks which are already quite time-consuming. We will also try to find the reason why organisations established by groups of citizens should, in the first place, be held to the same principles as those applying to the state.

Hungarian Government Obstructs Access to Morning-After Pill

Three Hungarian NGOs are seeking answers from the state health authority after it decided against granting over-the-counter access to a morning-after pill out of concern for women's health.

HCLU Accounts to the Public, not to GCO

We consider the attempts by the Government Control Office (GCO) to audit our programs financed by the Norway NGO Fund a political attack. We will reveal everything to the public, but not to the government, which has no jurisdiction over this sphere of activities. As advocates of freedom rights we often urge citizens to actively protect their rights. Now the time has come for us to protect ourselves against this politically motivated unlawful attack. We consider the accusations that we use the Norwegian money to support LMP (Politics Can Be Different) and other leftwing liberal parties absurd. We always criticise those in power for abusing their power and violating rights; that’s what we always did, and that’s what we still do.