Government decides on totalitarian refugee laws

With the use of the military inside the country and the reclassification of illegal border crossing from an offence to a crime, the government would put in force totalitarian practices before the change of the regime. Therefore, TASZ calls upon the parliamentarians to reject a law which ignores the basic requirements of constitutionality   in light of the human rights crisis produced by the high number of refugees.

In the last few months, the high number of people fleeing to Hungary to escape war has caused the largest human rights crisis in the past decade. People are arriving in Hungary with serious physical and psychological injuries and do not receive any help from the Hungarian state. Rather, it works to expel them to Serbia as soon as possible. Virtually the only volunteer presence are civilians who have been working to ease the sufferings of the refugees for months, and who try to help the indigents with food, clothes, hygienic equipment and information from their own money and resources. The Hungarian state should fulfill its own moral and legal duties instead of avoiding its obligation by restricting freedom and deterring assistance.

The bill presented to Parliament would introduce restrictions of rights which do not have a constitutional basis. Accordingly, during the “crisis caused by mass immigration” (which has been declared and fostered by the government)  a policeman can enter  a private apartment if there are supposedly people who crossed the border illegally. This means that the police can break in upon a Hungarian citizen who gives shelter to a refugee family, or practically anybody. The bill threatens a prison sentence to those who cross the barbed wire fence on the border of Hungary, or who damage  or inhibit the building work of the fence. Therefore, practically every refugee becomes the perpetrator of a crime also which gives the government the basis to punish them, and furthermore deport them, even if it would tear apart families. The military will participate with firearms, not only in the prevention of violent actions, but in all measures necessary for the handling of mass migration. Other coercive devices which can cause physical injury can be used against anybody if it is not intended to end human life. According to the bill, rubber bullets, captive nets, pyrotechnical devices and tear-gas grenades do not count as firearm use, and therefore do not need to be in accordance with the rules restricting their use. It is apparent the government is working on restricting the rights of refugees and their helpers instead of working out plans to provide accommodation, sustenance, transportation and healthcare especially in the upcoming autumn and winter period.

The crisis of mass immigration cannot be the basis for the suspension of fundamental rights or of restricting them beyond strictly necessary measures. Only restrictions meeting this standard are acceptable. They must ease harm and suffering and serve the the cause of human rights. It is the primary duty of the Hungarian government to defend these rights, and not allow them to fall by the wayside to defend the border.

Share

Related articles

OPERATION STARVE & STRANGLE: How the government uses the law to repress Hungary's civic spirit

On 13 February 2018, the Hungarian government introduced in Parliament the ‘Stop Soros’ package, a legislative proposal of three bills that target civil society organisations working on migration.

● Bill T/1976 on the licensing of organisations supporting migration;

● Bill T/19775 on the immigration financing duty;

● Bill T/19774 on the immigration restraint order.

What Is The Problem With The Hungarian Law On Foreign Funded NGOs?

On 13 June 2017, the Hungarian National Assembly (Parliament) adopted the Act LXXVI of 2017 on the Transparency of Organisations Supported from Abroad (hereinafter: the Law). It obliges associations and foundations that receives at least 7.2 million HUF annually from foreign source to register with the court as an organization receiving foreign funding, to annually report about their foreign funding, and to indicate the label “organization receiving foreign funding” on their website and publications. The list of foreign funded NGOs is also published on a government website. 

Constitutional Court filing by NGOs

Read our constitutional complaint in which we articulate that according to our position, the regulatory concept of the entire Act LXXVI of 2017 on the Transparency of Organisations Receiving Foreign Funds is contrary to the Fundamental Law and therefore we primarily request the nullification of the entire Act.