HCLU's position on the Altering of the Health Care Statute

HCLU examined statute-proposal number: T/1093 which is part of the health care reform plan submitted to Parliament by the Ministry of Health and found it rather disturbing on several points.

The proposal practically eliminates the right for one to choose his/her own physician and would become a privilege for wealthier patients only. It would also introduce discriminative and unjust measures jeopardizing prompt medical services by obliging patients to pay a surplus in order to receive emergency or on call medical service, irrespective of the gravity and urgency of the health issue in question. It also states that the patient may be charged up to as much as the entire cost of procedures provided at the institution, if the patient is not taken care of in the appropriate hospital.

This in practice would lead to geographical and chronologic issues determining the costs of healthcare an individual is set to receive. For example, take two insured people who happen to fracture their legs: the one closer to his/her authorized hospital and within consultation hours is in advantage, while the patient who suffered an accident far from his/her authorized hospital and during the evening, will be billed for a much larger sum.

The homeless issue is also cause for concern regarding this new type of geographical authorization system since we are not convinced that medical institutions will provide healthcare for people with no official home address and hence no legal entrance to any hospital according to the new statute-proposal.

The proposal also terminates the transparency of waiting lists thus eliminating outside control and providing feeding ground for misuse and manipulation.

Last but not least, it is shocking to see how the Ministry of Health slowly but surely considers its everyday practice to totally exclude NGO's from voicing their opinions regarding relevant issues, even though it is legally obliged to do so.

 

Share

Related articles

The government has no voice in family planning!

With its latest measures aiming to tighten regulations on medical sterilization, the government is about to intrude into the private lives of citizens. The proposal is another attempt at increasing the number of births – however, similarly to abortion regulations, the planned restrictions are not only inexpedient, but they also violate basic rights.

Aggravation of Abortion? – Problems, typical of the whole of the Constitution framing process, around the protection of the right to life of the fetus

 Last year one of the first news about the text of the new Constitution was about the extension of right to life to the fetus. The bill submitted to the Parliament is about the protection of the right to life of the fetus. The nontransparent framing process of the Constitution and the lack of real public debate make it impossible to have a clear view on this issue. On March 31 HCLU and Patent Association gave out a joint press release.

Co-operation Instead of Hostility

The Doctors for Free and Safe Birth have issued a declaration regarding Home Birth. Read it!