NGOs in 9 EU Countries Request Information and Impact Analyses of Covid-19 Tracing Apps

Human rights organizations in nine EU countries, members of the Civil Liberties Union for Europe (Liberties) network, are simultaneously filing freedom of information requests to their national authorities regarding the new contact-tracing, symptom-tracking and quarantine-enforcing applications introduced to control the spread of Covid-19.

The initiative, the first of its kind, aims to ensure that EU governments are not processing more personal data than what is necessary to protect public health, and that they pay appropriate attention to minimizing the risk of data leakage and other privacy breaches.

“While the aim of saving lives and livelihoods is without doubt salutary, the path of mass surveillance is quite possibly unnecessary and surely dangerous to take. Human rights organisations need to make sure that European governments take their responsibility to prepare impact assessments seriously and no European government uses the pandemic as a pretext for normalizing the expanded use of invasive digital surveillance technologies”, said Orsolya Reich, senior advocacy officer at Liberties.

Liberties expects to receive quality information from some EU member states showing the introduction of proportionate measures and due consideration of the GDPR when introducing technologies used to control the pandemic. Such cases will be used to strengthen the argument that lawful conduct is possible during the pandemic. Where member states fail to provide all public data related to the applications, or data protection regulations are breached, Liberties’ members will start litigation.

“Liberties’ aim is to reverse the increased level of surveillance. We believe that contact-tracing, symptom-tracking and quarantine-enforcing applications should only be used if evidence shows that they are effective, for the set purposes, on a voluntarily basis. The principles set out in the GDPR should be followed. Without unsurveilled public and private spheres, no democracy can flourish”, said Eva Simon, senior advocacy officer at Liberties.

This initiative is calling the attention of governments and the general public to the fact that human rights are important safeguards during emergency situations, such as this pandemic. They ensure public trust – a precondition for any successful social coordination – and ultimately protect public health.

The countries joining the initiative include Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Poland, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden.


Related articles

Coronavirus: legal survival kit for quarantine in Hungary

We can hear a lot about quarantine with regard to the new coronavirus outbreak (i.e. COVID-19). Whole municipalities have been already locked down by the authorities in China and Italy, but geographical quarantine is not the only epidemiological measure that can be taken by the State during an outbreak. In the present document we will review one by one how the State can limit your everyday life in case of a serious epidemiological situation.

Call for urgent amicus briefs!

In April 2014 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) declared invalid the Data Retention Directive that unified the rules of the retention of selective data by Internet and telephone services and determined the accessibility of data by authorities in the member states. Despite the content of the judgment, the Hungarian act allowing data retention is still in force. In October, 2014 the HCLU started litigation against two major service providers in order to force the Hungarian Constitutional Court (CC) to repeal the unlawful act.

Make the registering procedure for Orbán’s press conferences public!

The government is working hard to obscure the events and to confuse the public opinion following the banning of several editorial offices - including the staff of, one of the most read online portals - from Orbán’s annual “Orbáninfo” last Thursday. While the fact alone that the Prime Minister is willing to expose himself -once a year - to journalists independent from the government is a rarity, it is decided entirely arbitrarily who may be given this opportunity and who will be denied entry.