2nd year preschoolers might have to skip 3rd year and end up in primary school instead

The new regulation, according to which, all children who reach 6 years of age before 31 August 2020 must start school in September, creates surreal situations. What about those 5-year-olds who are attending the 2nd (middle) year of preschool and will be 6 before enrolling in the 3rd and final year of pre-primary education?

We have extensively discussed and will probably continue to discuss the new regulations on education, in effect since summer 2019. We try to help those applying for an individual study schedule (that is to replace private studentship) and those who do not want their little ones to be mandatorily enrolled at preschool at the age of 4.

The situation is most pressing for those parents who do not want their children, turning 6 next year, to start 1st grade in September. They may request exemption from the regulation only in an extremely narrow time-frame, between 1 and 15 January, within the framework of a lengthy and highly uncertain process. Their only hope is if the expert committee decides that their child is not (going to be) mature enough for school, in which case they do not even have to submit the exemption request. We have covered this subject in more detail here. But some children might find themselves in the grey zone between the middle year of preschool and the 1st grade of primary school; today’s post is about them.

(Still) no regulation

The law is quite clear: whoever reaches 6 years of age by the deadline, must go to school, the only loophole being parents possibly requesting that their child remain in preschool for one more year.

Surreal as it may sound, for all we know now, even parents whose children do not yet attend the final year of preschool will be compelled to submit the exemption request, since the regulation establishes the school entry date based only on the child’s age. What the Educational Authority will then do with these requests is unknown at this stage.

The reason for all this uncertainty is that the decree containing the details of the new law, applicable beginning in January 2020, is still not available in the middle of November. Everything we know about the decree is based on the informal communication of the Secretary of State responsible for education.

Verdict by experts?

Two weeks ago the Secretary of State stated that the Educational Authority would forward all well-founded requests to an expert committee. It seems, thus, that it is not the Educational Authority making the real decisions, as their decision will be based on the verdict of the committee.

If this is so, parents whose children are attending the middle year of preschool don’t have much to worry about, as their children are obviously not yet mature enough for school. But is it possible that they would be sent to school anyway?

The only point of mandatory preschool attendance is jeopardized

Many disapprove of the fact that children aged 5 (and from next year on, 4) are required to start preschool; we are among the many. The Supreme Court has also studied the matter and concluded that the final year of preschool plays an important role in preparing children for school and thus, attendance should be mandatory. But children attending the 2nd year of preschool right now and turning 6 next year are being compelled by the new decree to skip the very year that is crucial in their preparation for school.

Pushing these children to 1st grade would be admitting that the 3rd year of preschool education is not so important after all and that participation is not necessary in order to start 1st grade in primary school. This would undermine the entire system of argumentation in favour of mandatory preschool attendance.

And what if someone does not submit the request?

The only way for 6-year-olds not to be sent to 1st grade automatically is the exemption request submitted by their parents. No one knows, however, what will happen if a parent in such a situation does not submit the request. As far as we know now, these children must start school in September 2020.

It would be of utmost importance to publish the decree containing the details of the exemption. All the more so since it is ready by now, we are told.

As long as the details are unknown, we suggest that if parents want to make sure their child will stay in preschool for one more year, they should take them to school maturity examinations now.

Send us your questions and feedback

A lot of you have contacted us recently, and we thank you for that. We have received feedback from a number of experts and parents telling us how they adapt to the new regulations. These are really important for us as they help us assess local practices and enable us to advise those seeking assistance from us.

And with many specific requests for help, we are trying to give everyone useful answers. Contact our legal assistance service by emailing to tasz@tasz.hu! Don’t let your children be nationalized, act now!

Share

Related articles

Human rights NGOs demand consultation on the implementation of the UPR recommendations

On 21, September representatives of several human rights non-governmental organisations (NGOs) met with delegates of the Hungarian Government at the Ministry of Public Administration and Justice to have a discussion about the future steps of implementing the recommendations accepted by the government in the Universal Periodic Review (UPR). The NGOs were critical of the government's demonstrated unwillingness to have effective and meaningful consultation with civil society prior to deciding which recommendations to accept and decline in the UPR process. The NGOs raised further concerns about some of the recommendations that were rejected by the state. Finally, the NGOs proposed that the government set up working groups consisting of NGO and government representatives, which would regularly convene to develop steps and measures required to implement the recommendations accepted by the government, and to monitor the implementation process. The representatives of the government indicated that they would respond to this proposal by the end of October.

HCLU Film 2010

In 2010 HCLU produced 127 videos. There are 91 foreign language (English or Russian) and 36 Hungarian language videos. Besides drug policy, we produced many interesting films in the fields of HIV/AIDS and human rights, disability rights, freedom of speech and freedom of information, and within the framework of the HCLU's roma program on the issues of roma rights. All our films from 2010 are available from this picture illustrated portfolio.